Carcinogenicity of the aromatic amines: From structure-activity relationships to mechanisms of action and risk assessment

被引:148
|
作者
Benigni, R [1 ]
Passerini, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Super Sanita, Comparat Toxicol & Ecotoxicol Lab, I-00161 Rome, Italy
关键词
QSAR; amine; carcinogen; structure-activity; toxicity;
D O I
10.1016/S1383-5742(02)00008-X
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Aromatic an-tines represent one of the most important classes of industrial and environmental chemicals: many of them have been reported to be powerful carcinogens and mutagens, and/or hemotoxicants. Their toxicity has been studied also with quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) methods: these studies are potentially suitable for investigating mechanisms of action and for estimating the toxicity of compounds lacking experimental determinations. In this paper, we first summarized the QSAR models for the rodent carcinogenicity of the aromatic amines. The gradation of potency of the carcinogenic amines depended firstly on their hydrophobicity, and secondly on electronic (reactivity, propensity to be metabolically transformed) and steric properties. On the contrary, the difference between carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic aromatic amines depended mainly on electronic and steric properties. These QSARs can be used directly for estimating the carcinogenicity of aromatic amines. A two-step prediction is possible: (1) estimation of yes/no activity; (2) if the answer from step I is yes, then prediction of the degree of potency. The QSARs for rodent carcinogenicity were put in a wider context by comparing them with those for: (a) Salmonella mutagenicity; (b) general toxicity; (c) enzymatic reactions; (d) physical-chemical reactions. This comparative QSAR exercise generated a coherent global picture of the action mechanisms of the aromatic amines. The QSARs for carcinogenicity were similar to those for Salmonella mutagenicity, thus pointing to a similar mechanism of action. On the contrary, the general toxicity QSARs (both in vitro and in vivo systems) were mostly based on hydrophobicity, pointing to an aspecific mechanism of action much simpler than that for carcinogenicity and mutagenicity. The oxidation of the amines (first step in the main metabolic pathway leading to carcinogenic and mutagenic species) had identical QSARs in both enzymatic and physical-chemical systems, thus providing evidence for the link between simple chemical reactions and those in biological systems. The results show that it is possible to generate mechanistically and statistically sound QSAR models for rodent carcinogenicity, and indirectly that the rodent bioassay is a reliable source of good quality data. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 206
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity of aromatic amines: a quantitative structure-activity relationships model
    Franke, R
    Gruska, A
    Giuliani, A
    Benigni, R
    [J]. CARCINOGENESIS, 2001, 22 (09) : 1561 - 1571
  • [2] DDS - MECHANISMS OF ACTION AND STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS
    VANDYKE, K
    [J]. ARCHIVES INTERNATIONALES DE PHARMACODYNAMIE ET DE THERAPIE, 1972, 200 (01): : 147 - +
  • [3] Quantitative structure-activity relationships of mutagenic and carcinogenic aromatic amines
    Benigni, R
    Giuliani, A
    Franke, R
    Gruska, A
    [J]. CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2000, 100 (10) : 3697 - 3714
  • [4] Structure-activity relationships of polycyclic aromatic amines with calcium channel blocking activity
    Malan, SF
    Van der Walt, JJ
    Van der Schyf, CJ
    [J]. ARCHIV DER PHARMAZIE, 2000, 333 (01) : 10 - 16
  • [5] Quantitative structure-activity (QSAR) relationships of mutagenic aromatic and heterocyclic amines
    Hatch, FT
    Colvin, ME
    [J]. MUTATION RESEARCH-FUNDAMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS, 1997, 376 (1-2) : 87 - 96
  • [6] Review of mutagenicity of monocyclic aromatic amines: quantitative structure-activity relationships
    Chung, KT
    Kirkovsky, L
    Kirkovsky, A
    Purcell, WP
    [J]. MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, 1997, 387 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [7] STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS OF PHENYLISOPROPYL AMINES
    VANDERSCHOOT, JB
    [J]. ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA ET PHARMACOLOGICA NEERLANDICA, 1959, 8 (02): : 313 - 314
  • [8] Antibacterial activities of anthraquinones: structure-activity relationships and action mechanisms
    Qun, Tang
    Zhou, Tiantian
    Hao, Jiongkai
    Wang, Chunmei
    Zhang, Keyu
    Xu, Jing
    Wang, Xiaoyang
    Zhou, Wen
    [J]. RSC MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2023, 14 (08): : 1446 - 1471
  • [9] Mechanisms of action and structure-activity relationships of cytotoxic flavokawain derivatives
    Thieury, Charlotte
    Lebouvier, Nicolas
    Le Guevel, Remy
    Barguil, Yann
    Herbette, Gaetan
    Antheaume, Cyril
    Hnawia, Edouard
    Asakawa, Yoshinori
    Nour, Mohammed
    Guillaudeux, Thierry
    [J]. BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2017, 25 (06) : 1817 - 1829
  • [10] LATEST DEVELOPMENTS IN NITROSAMINE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS FOR CARCINOGENICITY
    Ponting, David
    [J]. DRUG METABOLISM AND PHARMACOKINETICS, 2024, 55