Plasmasphere and topside ionosphere reconstruction using METOP satellite data during geomagnetic storms

被引:11
|
作者
Prol, Fabricio S. [1 ]
Hoque, Mohammed M. [1 ]
Ferreira, Arthur A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] German Aerosp Ctr DLR, Inst Solar Terr Phys, Kalkhorstweg 53, D-17235 Neustrelitz, Germany
[2] Univ Brasilia UNB, Dept Elect Engn, BR-71910900 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
space weather; algebraic reconstruction technique; constrained tomography; DMSP; St; Patrick day; ELECTRON-DENSITY; GPS-TEC; MODEL; PLASMAPAUSE; TOMOGRAPHY; HEIGHT; FIELD;
D O I
10.1051/swsc/2020076
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
As part of the space weather monitoring, the response of the ionosphere and plasmasphere to geomagnetic storms is typically under continuous supervision by operational services. Fortunately, Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers on board low Earth orbit satellites provides a unique opportunity for developing image representations that can capture the global distribution of the electron density in the plasmasphere and topside ionosphere. Among the difficulties of plasmaspheric imaging based on GNSS measurements, the development of procedures to invert the total electron content (TEC) into electron density distributions remains as a challenging task. In this study, a new tomographic reconstruction technique is presented to estimate the electron density from TEC data along the METOP (METeorological OPerational) satellites. The proposed method is evaluated during four geomagnetic storms to check the capabilities of the tomography for space weather monitoring. The investigation shows that the developed method can successfully capture and reconstruct well-known enhancement and decrease of electron density variabilities during storms. The comparison with in-situ electron densities has shown an improvement around 11% and a better description of plasma variabilities due to the storms compared to the background. Our study also reveals that the plasmasphere TEC contribution to ground-based TEC may vary 10-60% during geomagnetic storms, and the contribution tends to reduce during the storm-recovery phase.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Light ion dynamics in the topside ionosphere and plasmasphere during geomagnetic storms
    Pakhotin, I. P.
    Burchill, J. K.
    Foerster, M.
    Lomidze, L.
    [J]. EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2023, 75 (01):
  • [2] Light ion dynamics in the topside ionosphere and plasmasphere during geomagnetic storms
    I. P. Pakhotin
    J. K. Burchill
    M. Förster
    L. Lomidze
    [J]. Earth, Planets and Space, 75
  • [3] TOPSIDE IONOSPHERE DURING GEOMAGNETIC STORMS
    WARREN, ES
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1969, 57 (06) : 1029 - &
  • [4] BEHAVIOR OF IONOSPHERE AND PLASMASPHERE DURING GEOMAGNETIC STORMS
    JONES, TB
    [J]. NATURE, 1976, 259 (5538) : 9 - 10
  • [5] RESPONSE OF TOPSIDE IONOSPHERE TO GEOMAGNETIC STORMS
    MARUBASH.K
    TAYLOR, HA
    REBER, CA
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1974, 55 (04): : 379 - 379
  • [6] Polar Topside Ionosphere During Geomagnetic Storms: Comparison of ISIS-II With TDIM
    Sojka, J. J.
    Rice, D.
    Eccles, V.
    David, M.
    Schunk, R. W.
    Benson, R. F.
    James, H. G.
    [J]. RADIO SCIENCE, 2018, 53 (07) : 906 - 920
  • [7] Geomagnetic Storm Effects on the Topside Ionosphere and Plasmasphere: A Compact Tutorial and New Results
    Matthias Förster
    Norbert Jakowski
    [J]. Surveys in Geophysics, 2000, 21 : 47 - 87
  • [8] Geomagnetic storm effects on the topside ionosphere and plasmasphere:: A compact tutorial and new results
    Förster, M
    Jakowski, N
    [J]. SURVEYS IN GEOPHYSICS, 2000, 21 (01) : 47 - 87
  • [9] Topside Ionosphere and Plasmasphere Modelling Using GNSS Radio Occultation and POD Data
    Prol, Fabricio S.
    Hoque, M. Mainul
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (08)
  • [10] Contribution of the topside and bottomside ionosphere to the total electron content during two strong geomagnetic storms
    Zhu, Qingyu
    Lei, Jiuhou
    Luan, Xiaoli
    Dou, Xiankang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2016, 121 (03) : 2475 - 2488