Increased Medial Longitudinal Arch Mobility, Lower Extremity Kinematics, and Ground Reaction Forces in High-Arched Runners

被引:35
|
作者
Williams, D. S. Blaise, III [1 ]
Tierney, Robin N. [2 ]
Butler, Robert J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[2] Access Phys Therapy & Wellness, Knightdale, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Div Phys Therapy, Durham, NC USA
关键词
foot; running injuries; joint coupling; LEG STIFFNESS; IN-VIVO; FOOT; HEIGHT; MECHANICS; SURFACE; WALKING;
D O I
10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.05
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Context: Runners with high medial longitudinal arch structure demonstrate unique kinematics and kinetics that may lead to running injuries. The mobility of the midfoot as measured by the change in arch height is also suspected to play a role in lower extremity function during running. The effect of arch mobility in high-arched runners is an important factor in prescribing footwear, training, and rehabilitating the running athlete after injury. Objective: To examine the effect of medial longitudinal arch mobility on running kinematics, ground reaction forces, and loading rates in high-arched runners. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Human movement research laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 104 runners were screened for arch height. Runners were then identified as having high arches if the arch height index was greater than 0.5 SD above the mean. Of the runners with high arches, 11 rigid runners with the lowest arch mobility (R) were compared with 8 mobile runners with the highest arch mobility (M). Arch mobility was determined by calculating the left arch height index in all runners. Intervention(s): Three-dimensional motion analysis of running over ground. Main Outcome Measure(s): Rearfoot and tibial angular excursions, eversion-to-tibial internal-rotation ratio, vertical ground reaction forces, and the associated loading rates. Results: Runners with mobile arches exhibited decreased tibial internal-rotation excursion (mobile: 5.68 degrees +/- 2.38 degrees versus rigid: 8.08 degrees +/- 3.08 degrees), greater eversion-to-tibial internal-rotation ratio (mobile: 2.1 +/- 0.8 versus rigid: 1.5 6 0.5), decreased second peak vertical ground reaction force values (mobile: 2.3 6 0.2 3 body weight versus rigid: 2.4 +/- 0.1 x body weight), and decreased vertical loading rate values (mobile: 55.7 +/- 14.1 x body weight/s versus rigid: 65.9 +/- 11.4 x body weight/s). Conclusions: Based on the results of this study, it appears that runners with high arch structure but differing arch mobility exhibited differences in select lower extremity movement patterns and forces. Future authors should investigate the impact of arch mobility on running-related injuries.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 296
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Body weight and the medial longitudinal foot arch: high-arched foot, a hidden problem?
    R. Woźniacka
    A. Bac
    S. Matusik
    E. Szczygieł
    E. Ciszek
    [J]. European Journal of Pediatrics, 2013, 172 : 683 - 691
  • [2] Body weight and the medial longitudinal foot arch: high-arched foot, a hidden problem?
    Wozniacka, R.
    Bac, A.
    Matusik, S.
    Szczygiel, E.
    Ciszek, E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2013, 172 (05) : 683 - 691
  • [3] Surface effects on ground reaction forces and lower extremity kinematics in running
    Dixon, SJ
    Collop, AC
    Batt, ME
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2000, 32 (11): : 1919 - 1926
  • [4] Effects of arch-support orthoses on ground reaction forces and lower extremity kinematics related to running at various inclinations
    Lam, Wing-Kai
    Pak, Lok-Yee
    Wong, Charis King-Wai
    Tan, Mohammad Farhan
    Park, Sang-Kyoon
    Ryu, Jiseon
    Leung, Aaron Kam-Lun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2020, 38 (14) : 1629 - 1634
  • [5] GROUND REACTION FORCES AND SELECTED LOWER-EXTREMITY KINEMATICS DURING BATTING
    MESSIER, SP
    OWEN, MG
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1985, 17 (02): : 221 - 222
  • [6] Ground Reaction Forces and Lower Extremity Kinematics When Running With Suppressed Arm Swing
    Miller, Ross H.
    Caldwell, Graham E.
    Van Emmerik, Richard E. A.
    Umberger, Brian R.
    Hamill, Joseph
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2009, 131 (12):
  • [7] THE MECHANICS OF BATTING - ANALYSIS OF GROUND REACTION FORCES AND SELECTED LOWER-EXTREMITY KINEMATICS
    MESSIER, SP
    OWEN, MG
    [J]. RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 1985, 56 (02) : 138 - 143
  • [8] Lower Extremity Kinematics And Ground Reaction Forces Of Children During A Vertical Jump Landing
    Justiniano, Luis M.
    Cowley, Jeff
    Laurson, Kelly
    Torry, Mike
    Mccaw, Steven
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2013, 45 (05): : 486 - 486
  • [9] Relationships Between Arch Height Flexibility and Medial-Lateral Ground Reaction Forces in Rearfoot and Forefoot Strike Runners
    Johnson, Caleb D.
    Davis, Irene S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMECHANICS, 2021, 37 (02) : 118 - 121
  • [10] Lower extremity kinematics and ground reaction forces after prophylactic lace-up ankle bracing
    DiStefano, Lindsay J.
    Padua, Darin A.
    Brown, Cathleen N.
    Guskiewicz, Kevin M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2008, 43 (03) : 234 - 241