This paper discusses the theoretical properties and the empirical application of an improved version of the 'relative advantage maximising' (RAM) model. This model shares several desirable features of a set of models based on random regret minimisation (RRM), such as parsimony and choice set dependence. Although model fit differences are small, a preliminary comparison shows that the RAM model empirically outperforms the standard random utility maximisation (RUM) model, the RRM model, and a hybrid RUM-RRM model in all eight data sets analysed. The paper concludes with a discussion of the marginal willingness to pay (WTP) measures derived from the RAM model.
机构:
Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Sch Hotel & Tourism Management, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R ChinaQueens Univ Belfast, Sch Biol Sci, Gibson Inst Land Food & Environm, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
机构:
Queen Mary Univ London, London, England
Queen Mary Univ London, Sch Econ & Finance, Mile End Rd, London E1 4NS, EnglandUniv Sussex, Brighton, E Sussex, England
机构:
Univ Leeds, Inst Transport Studies, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
Univ Leeds, Choice Modelling Ctr, Leeds, W Yorkshire, EnglandUniv Leeds, Inst Transport Studies, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
Hess, Stephane
Daly, Andrew
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Leeds, Inst Transport Studies, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
Univ Leeds, Choice Modelling Ctr, Leeds, W Yorkshire, EnglandUniv Leeds, Inst Transport Studies, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
Daly, Andrew
Batley, Richard
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Leeds, Inst Transport Studies, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
Univ Leeds, Choice Modelling Ctr, Leeds, W Yorkshire, EnglandUniv Leeds, Inst Transport Studies, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England