The reality of cross-disciplinary energy research in the United Kingdom: A social science perspective

被引:34
|
作者
Mallaband, B. [1 ,6 ]
Wood, G. [2 ,7 ]
Buchanan, K. [3 ]
Staddon, S. [4 ]
Mogles, N. M. [5 ]
Gabe-Thomas, E. [5 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Loughborough, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
[2] Coventry Univ, Priory St, Coventry CV1 5FB, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Drummond St, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] Univ Bath, Calverton Rd, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[6] Aston Univ, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
[7] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[8] Univ Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Interdisciplinary Social science; Energy research; Early career researchers; INTEGRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2016.11.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Cross-disciplinary research is essential in understanding and reducing energy usage, however the reality of this collaboration comes with many challenges. This paper provides an insight into the integration of social science in energy research, drawing on the expertise and first hand experiences of a range of social science researchers (predominantly Early Career Researchers (ECRs)) working on UK cross-disciplinary projects in energy demand. These researchers, participants in a workshop dedicated to understanding the integration of social science in energy research, identified four groups of challenges to successful integration: Differing expectations of the role of social scientists; Working within academia; Feeling like a valued member of the team; and Communicating and comprehension between disciplines. Suggestions of how to negotiate those challenges included: Management and planning; Increasing contact; Sharing experience; and Understanding team roles. The paper offers a definition of 'success' in cross-disciplinary energy research from the perspective of social science ECRs, comprising external, internal and personal components. Using the logics of interdisciplinarity, this paper suggests that integration of the social sciences in the projects discussed may be partial at best and highlights a need to recognise the challenges ECRs face, in order to achieve full integration and equality of disciplines. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 18
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The mythology and reality of cross-disciplinary research
    Osborn, RN
    Baughn, CC
    Hagedoorn, J
    INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS SCHOLARSHIP: MASTERING INTELLECTUAL, INSTITUTIONAL, AND RESEARCH DESIGN CHALLENGES, 2001, : 101 - 116
  • [2] Cross-disciplinary interaction in information science research
    Bicalho, Lucineia
    TRANSINFORMACAO, 2011, 23 (02): : 113 - 126
  • [3] Cross-disciplinary, social-context research
    King, JL
    MORE THAN SCREEN DEEP: TOWARD EVERY-CITIZEN INTERFACES TO THE NATION'S INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE, 1997, : 411 - 416
  • [4] CROSS-DISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
    GLAZE, WH
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1988, 22 (09) : 987 - 987
  • [5] Modals in the construction of research articles: A cross-disciplinary perspective
    Peacock, Matthew
    IBERICA, 2014, (27): : 143 - 164
  • [6] A Cross-Disciplinary Course on Virtual Reality
    Cliburn, Daniel C.
    2018 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE (FIE), 2018,
  • [7] The case for cross-disciplinary social science research on poverty, inequality and well-being
    Hulme, David
    Toye, John
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2006, 42 (07): : 1085 - 1107
  • [8] Creating cross-disciplinary research alliances to advance nursing science
    Loeb, Susan J.
    Penrod, Janice
    Kolanowski, Ann
    Hupcey, Judith E.
    Haidet, Kim Kopenhaver
    Fick, Donna M.
    McGonigle, Dee
    Yu, Fang
    JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2008, 40 (02) : 195 - 201
  • [9] Cross-Disciplinary Research and Scholarship
    Vickers, Shannon
    VOICE AND SPEECH REVIEW, 2023, 17 (02) : 129 - 130
  • [10] Science Faculty with Education Specialties: A Cross-Disciplinary Research Study
    Pelaez, Nancy J.
    Bush, Seth D.
    Rudd, James A.
    Stevens, Michael T.
    Tanner, Kimberly D.
    Williams, Kathy S.
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2009, 23