What sources of bereavement support are perceived helpful by bereaved people and why? Empirical evidence for the compassionate communities approach

被引:101
|
作者
Aoun, Samar M. [1 ,2 ]
Breen, Lauren J. [3 ]
White, Ishta [3 ]
Rumbold, Bruce [1 ]
Kellehear, Allan [4 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Palliat Care Unit, Dept Publ Hlth, Sch Psychol & Publ Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Notre Dame Univ, Inst Hlth Res, Fremantle, WA, Australia
[3] Curtin Univ, Sch Psychol, Fac Hlth Sci, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] Univ Bradford, Sch Nursing & Healthcare Leadership, Fac Hlth Studies, Bradford, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Public health; social support; capacity building; bereavement support; palliative care; OF-LIFE CARE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; COMPLICATED GRIEF; MENTAL-HEALTH; EXPERIENCES; END; PROFESSIONALS; PERSPECTIVE; UNHELPFUL; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1177/0269216318774995
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims: To determine who provides bereavement support in the community, what sources are perceived to be the most or least helpful and for what reason, and to identify the empirical elements for optimal support in developing any future compassionate communities approach in palliative care. Design: A population-based cross-sectional investigation of bereavement experiences. Sources of support (informal, community and professional) were categorised according to the Public Health Model of Bereavement Support; most helpful reasons were categorised using the Social Provisions Scale, and least helpful were analysed using inductive content analysis. Setting and participants: Bereaved people were recruited from databases of funeral providers in Australia via an anonymous postal survey (2013-2014). Results: In total, 678 bereaved people responded to the survey. The most frequently used sources of support were in the informal category such as family, friends and funeral providers. While the professional category sources were the least used, they had the highest proportions of perceived unhelpfulness whereas the lowest proportions of unhelpfulness were in the informal category. The functional types of helpful support were Attachment, Reliable Alliance, Social Integration and Guidance. The five themes for least helpful support were: Insensitivity, Absence of Anticipated Support, Poor Advice, Lack of Empathy and Systemic Hindrance. Conclusion: A public health approach, as exemplified by compassionate communities policies and practices, should be adopted to support the majority of bereaved people as much of this support is already provided in informal and other community settings by a range of people already involved in the everyday lives of those recently bereaved. This study has provided further support for the need to strengthen the compassionate communities approach, not only for end of life care for dying patients but also along the continuum of bereavement support.
引用
收藏
页码:1378 / 1388
页数:11
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] HELPFUL ASPECTS OF BEREAVEMENT SUPPORT FOR ADULTS FOLLOWING AN EXPECTED DEATH: VOLUNTEERS' AND BEREAVED PEOPLE'S PERSPECTIVES
    Diamond, Holly
    Llewelyn, Susan
    Relf, Marilyn
    Bruce, Carrie
    DEATH STUDIES, 2012, 36 (06) : 541 - 564
  • [2] Improving support for bereaved people within their communities Updating the nine-cell bereavement tool
    Hunt, Jenny
    Andrew, Gracy
    Weitz, Philippa
    BEREAVEMENT CARE, 2007, 26 (02) : 26 - 29
  • [3] A Compassionate Communities Approach in a Grief and Bereavement Support Program: Bridging the Gap in Palliative Care
    Zuniga-Villanueva, Gregorio
    Ramirez-GarciaLuna, Jose Luis
    Villafranca-Andino, Roy Ismael
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK IN END-OF-LIFE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2021, 17 (01) : 9 - 18
  • [4] Evidence of what works to support and sustain care at home for people with dementia: a literature review with a systematic approach
    Dawson, Alison
    Bowes, Alison
    Kelly, Fiona
    Velzke, Kari
    Ward, Richard
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2015, 15
  • [5] Evidence of what works to support and sustain care at home for people with dementia: a literature review with a systematic approach
    Alison Dawson
    Alison Bowes
    Fiona Kelly
    Kari Velzke
    Richard Ward
    BMC Geriatrics, 15