Compensatory Considerations for Radiological Emergency Response and Public Protective Actions during the COVID-19 Pandemic

被引:3
|
作者
Leek, Angela E. [1 ]
Semancik, Jeffrey D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa Dept Publ Hlth, Bur Chief, CHP, Radiol Hlth, Des Moines, IA USA
[2] Connecticut Dept Energy & Environm Protect, Radiat Protect Div, Hartford, CT USA
来源
HEALTH PHYSICS | 2022年 / 122卷 / 02期
关键词
emergencies; radiological; exposure; population; risk analysis; dose assessment;
D O I
10.1097/HP.0000000000001481
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Epidemiological evidence and models have demonstrated that the current COVID-19 pandemic introduces a significant public risk to implementing large-scale community evacuations in response to disasters. While guidance documented in the US Environmental Protection Agency Protective Action Guidance (PAG) Manual is widely accepted as the standard basis for public and emergency worker protective actions for a radiological emergency, it is based primarily on assessing the risks associated with the radiological factors alone. However, as demonstrated in response to the nuclear incident in Fukushima, these events seldom occur in isolation from other risk-inducing events. Today, the COVID-19 pandemic represents a significant public health risk that must also be considered alongside the radiation risks in determining appropriate public and emergency worker protection action decisions. In particular, the significant public health risks associated with community transmission and mortality of COVID-19 challenge our most familiar and rehearsed radiological response strategies. The 1992 and 2017 US Environmental Protection Agency PAG manuals allow for considerations in protective action decision making. Much of the radiation emergency response community has been conditioned through decades of structured training and exercises to focus public protection considerations on specific guidelines referenced numerically in tables within the manual. Discussion regarding adjustment of specific PAG values is provided in the footnotes and bases portions of the PAG manual but is often not included in jurisdictional plans or routinely considered in exercises. However, when properly applied, the protective action guidance provides the necessary flexibility for decision-makers to account for additional public health risks or impediments, and jurisdictions can use this guidance to build a more effective response strategy. The authors have applied the full guidance and flexibility provided in the 2017 US Environmental Protection Agency PAG Manual to develop more specific guidance for their respective jurisdictions' radiation emergency response plans and will outline a process for consideration of protective action decisions to maximize the protection of public health and safety.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 340
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Emergency online education policy and public response during the pandemic of COVID-19 in China
    Yang, Chengning
    Yuan, Jiahao
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2023, 43 (04) : 1015 - 1030
  • [2] THE COVID-19 PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSE: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES TO A RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR RADIOLOGICAL PLANNING
    Maiello, Mark L.
    [J]. HEALTH SECURITY, 2022, 20 (06) : 520 - 529
  • [3] Considerations for Continuing Semielective and Emergency Otolaryngological Procedures During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Mueller, Sarina K.
    Traxdorf, Maximilian
    Mantsopoulos, Konstantinos
    Gostian, Antoniu-Oreste
    Sievert, Matti
    Koch, Michael
    Huebner, Matthias J.
    Iro, Heinrich
    [J]. ENT-EAR NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL, 2021, 100 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [4] Nutritional considerations during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Andrade Alban, Maria Jose
    Rodriguez Cevallos, Maria de los Angeles
    Guallo Paca, Mariana Jesus
    Leon Morejon, Silvia Estefania
    [J]. REVISTA CUBANA DE REUMATOLOGIA, 2021, 23 (01):
  • [5] Tracheostomy Considerations during the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Shiba, Travis
    Ghazizadeh, Shabnam
    Chhetri, Dinesh
    St John, Maie
    Long, Jennifer
    [J]. OTO OPEN, 2020, 4 (02)
  • [6] Integrative considerations during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Alschuler, Lise
    Weil, Andrew
    Horwitz, Randy
    Stamets, Paul
    Chiasson, Ann Marie
    Crocker, Robert
    Maizes, Victoria
    [J]. EXPLORE-THE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND HEALING, 2020, 16 (06) : 354 - 356
  • [7] Early policy actions and emergency response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Mongolia: experiences and challenges
    Erkhembayar, Ryenchindorj
    Dickinson, Emma
    Badarch, Darmaa
    Narula, Indermohan
    Warburton, David
    Thomas, Graham Neil
    Ochir, Chimedsuren
    Manaseki-Holland, Semira
    [J]. LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 8 (09): : E1234 - E1241
  • [8] Comment on the response by emergency veterinary hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Wiwanitkit, Viroj
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY EMERGENCY AND CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 30 (05) : 602 - 602
  • [9] The evolving response by emergency veterinary hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Wayne, Annie
    Rozanski, Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY EMERGENCY AND CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 30 (05) : 601 - 601
  • [10] Nursing perspectives about the critical gaps in public health emergency response during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Norful, Allison A.
    Tucker, Sharon
    Miller, Pamela S.
    Roberts, Haley
    Kelley, Marjorie M.
    Monturo, Cheryl
    O'Mathuna, Donal
    Smith, Julia
    Zadvinskis, Inga M.
    Zellefrow, Cindy
    Chipps, Esther
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2023, 55 (01) : 22 - 28