THE USES OF HISTORY: A DISCUSSION OF JANNA SANDMEYER'S "UNDERSTANDING HOMOPHOBIA IN OUR FOREFATHERS: RETHINKING HOW KOHUT ACTUALLY WORKED"

被引：1

作者：

Finlon, Charles J. ^{[1
,2
,3
,4
]}

机构：

[1] Natl Inst Psychotherapies, Comm Divers & Inclus, New York, NY USA

[2] Int Assoc Psychoanalyt Self Psychol, Int Council, Vancouver, BC, Canada

[3] NYU, Silver Sch Social Work, New York, NY USA

[4] Minnesota Inst Contemporary Psychotherapy & Psych, Minneapolis, MN USA

来源：

PSYCHOANALYSIS SELF AND CONTEXT | 2019年 / 14卷 / 04期

关键词：

self psychology; history of psychoanalysis; homosexuality; presentism; blind spots;

D O I：

10.1080/24720038.2019.1646260

中图分类号：

B84-0 [心理学理论];

学科分类号：

040201 ;

摘要：

"Understanding Homophobia in Our Forefathers" models a way to approach historic papers like Miller's, which while containing useful information, also remind us of the ways psychoanalysis injured those it intended to help. Mores have changed, but human nature has not, and we are always at risk of acting on our fears or imposing our prejudices on others. At this point in history an important goal of psychoanalytic education should be helping candidates understand the power of the analyst's position and the ways psychoanalytic aims can be perverted by societal pressures and the analyst's blind spots.

引用

页码：397 / 401

页数：5