Five Decisive States: Examining How and Why Donald Trump Won the 2016 Election

被引:12
|
作者
Farley, John E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Illinois Univ Edwardsville, Dept Sociol, 1 Hairpin Dr, Edwardsville, IL 62025 USA
来源
SOCIOLOGICAL QUARTERLY | 2019年 / 60卷 / 03期
关键词
Political sociology; population; sociology of immigration; PREJUDICE; AUTHORITARIANISM; POLITICS; SUPPORT; RACISM;
D O I
10.1080/00380253.2019.1629847
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
The election of Donald Trump to the U.S. Presidency in 2016 is attributable to voting shifts in a small number of states between the 2008 and 2012 elections and the 2016 election. There were six states that voted for Barack Obama in the 2008 and 2012 elections and then for Donald Trump in 2016. In one state, Florida, voting shifts among the 2008, 2012, and 2016 elections were small. However, in the other five states, Iowa, Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, the voting shift was large, and it is the shifts in these states that largely account for Trump's Electoral College win. This article documents concentration of voting shifts in these and nearby states. These states share certain characteristics in common, including specialization in manufacturing, slow population growth, a common pattern with regards to Hispanic population change, and higher-than-average percentages of non-college-educated whites. In all of these states, disproportionate numbers of people voted twice for Obama and then for Trump. These voters, though a small percentage of the total electorate even in these states, were key to the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. This article examines how the aforementioned characteristics of these states contributed to the decisive shift by these voters and led to Trump's decisive victories in these five states.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 353
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条