Managing spatial uncertainty in remotely sensed data

被引:0
|
作者
Allan, RC [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Dept Land Informat, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
来源
关键词
spatial variability; generalisation; categorical data; remote sensing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The level of spatial uncertainty in geographical information systems (GIS) products is conditional on a number of operations on the spatial database prior to final output. Although stochastic and deterministic models have been used to predict the levels of uncertainty in digital map products through GIS operations such as overlay and buffering, the extent to which each operation contributes to overall product uncertainty is neither well known nor understood. An alternative approach is to examine the level of spatial uncertainty in the output product and then to improve the accuracy of this output by applying a rule-based model. In this paper, a conceptual rule-based model is proposed to effectively manage spatial uncertainty by examining the interrelationships between and within polygons resulting from the overlay of multiple independent human interpreter realisations of a satellite image. In a previous paper by Allan (1999), a method was proposed to extract information about these polygons from the overlay of these realisations for inclusion in the database and an approach was suggested in handling the resultant uncertainty polygons. Further work has seen the development of structural knowledge (rules) and procedural knowledge (operators) for managing these uncertainty polygons based on their likelihood of belonging to a particular thematic class. The adoption of such an approach is based on the semantic, geometric and spatial relations within and among uncertainty polygons generated from these realisations.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 22
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spatial Autocorrelation and Uncertainty Associated with Remotely-Sensed Data
    Griffith, Daniel A.
    Chun, Yongwan
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 8 (07)
  • [2] SPATIAL REASONING IN REMOTELY SENSED DATA
    WANG, S
    ELLIOTT, DB
    CAMPBELL, JB
    ERICH, RW
    HARALICK, RM
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1983, 21 (01): : 94 - 101
  • [3] Spatial calibration and uncertainty reduction of the SWAT model using multiple remotely sensed data
    Lee, Sangchul
    Kim, Dongho
    McCarty, Gregory W.
    Anderson, Martha
    Gao, Feng
    Lei, Fangni
    Moglen, Glenn E.
    Zhang, Xuesong
    Yen, Haw
    Qi, Junyu
    Crow, Wade
    Yeo, In -Young
    Sun, Liang
    [J]. HELIYON, 2024, 10 (10)
  • [4] Controlling Data Uncertainty via Aggregation in Remotely Sensed Data
    Carmel, Yohay
    [J]. IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2004, 1 (02) : 39 - 41
  • [5] Uncertainty propagation in models driven by remotely sensed data
    Crosetto, M
    Ruiz, JAM
    Crippa, B
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 76 (03) : 373 - 385
  • [6] Uncertainty management in neural classifiers of remotely sensed data
    Binaghi, E
    Madella, P
    Gallo, I
    Pepe, M
    Rampini, A
    [J]. IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR REMOTE SENSING V, 1999, 3871 : 195 - 204
  • [8] SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF REMOTELY SENSED SOIL MOISTURE DATA
    Thattai, Deeptha
    Islam, Shafiqul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2000, 5 (04) : 386 - 392
  • [9] Error and Uncertainty Degrade Topographic Corrections of Remotely Sensed Data
    Dozier, Jeff
    Bair, Edward H.
    Baskaran, Latha
    Brodrick, Philip G.
    Carmon, Nimrod
    Kokaly, Raymond F.
    Miller, Charles E.
    Miner, Kimberley R.
    Painter, Thomas H.
    Thompson, David R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2022, 127 (11)
  • [10] Exploring uncertainty in remotely sensed data with parallel coordinate plots
    Ge, Yong
    Li, Sanping
    Lakhan, V. Chris
    Lucieer, Arko
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2009, 11 (06): : 413 - 422