Oral nifedipine versus intravenous labetalol for severe hypertension during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:61
|
作者
Shekhar, S. [1 ]
Gupta, N. [2 ]
Kirubakaran, R. [3 ]
Pareek, P. [4 ]
机构
[1] AIIMS, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jodhpur 342005, Rajasthan, India
[2] AIIMS, Dept Pediat, Jodhpur 342005, Rajasthan, India
[3] Christian Med Coll Vellore, South Asian Cochrane Network, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
[4] AIIMS, Dept Radiat Oncol, Jodhpur 342005, Rajasthan, India
关键词
Labetalol; meta-analysis nifedipine; severe hypertension during pregnancy; severe pre-eclampsia; PHARMACOLOGICAL-TREATMENT; MAGNESIUM-SULFATE; EMERGENCIES; MANAGEMENT; DISORDERS;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.13463
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundOral nifedipine is recommended along with labetalol and hydralazine for treatment of severe hypertension during pregnancy by most authorities. Although nifedipine is cheap and easily administered, the usage pattern among health care providers suggests a strong preference for labetalol despite lack of evidence for the same. ObjectivesTo determine the efficacy and safety of oral nifedipine for treatment of severe hypertension of pregnancy compared with intravenous labetalol. Search strategyWe systematically searched for articles comparing oral nifedipine with intravenous labetalol for the treatment of severe hypertension during pregnancy in any language, over Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials and Google Scholar from inception till February 2014. Selection criteriaWe included all RCTs that compared intravenous labetalol with oral nifedipine for treatment of severe hypertension during pregnancy, addressing relevant efficacy and safety outcomes. Data collection and analysisEligible studies were reviewed, and data were extracted onto a standard form. We used Cochrane review manager software for quantitative analysis. Data were analysed using a fixed effect model. Main resultsThe pooled analysis of seven trials (four from developing countries) consisting of 363 woman-infant pairs showed that oral nifedipine was associated with less risk of persistent hypertension (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.96) and reported maternal side effects (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.35-0.94). However, on sensitivity analysis the outcome persistent hypertension' was no longer significant. Other outcomes did not reach statistical significance. ConclusionOral nifedipine is as efficacious and safe as intravenous labetalol and may have an edge in low resource settings. Tweetable abstractAlthough studies to date are few in number and small, nifedipine shows promise for severe hypertension in pregnancy. Tweetable abstract Although studies to date are few in number and small, nifedipine shows promise for severe hypertension in pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 47
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oral nifedipine versus intravenous labetalol for hypertensive emergencies during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Lin
    Xie, Wenxia
    Xu, Hao
    Cao, Lei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2023, 36 (02):
  • [2] Intravenous Labetalol versus Oral Nifedipine in the Treatment of Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy
    Mayanglambam, Ronita Devi
    Anjali, Tempe
    [J]. KUWAIT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 44 (04): : 287 - 290
  • [3] Oral nifedipine versus intravenous labetalol for the treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy
    Shi, Qingquan
    Leng, Wenying
    Yao, Qiang
    Mi, Chen
    Xing, Aiyun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 178 : 162 - 164
  • [4] Oral nifedipine or intravenous labetalol for severe hypertension?
    Magee, L. A.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (01) : 48 - 48
  • [5] Oral nifedipine versus intravenous labetalol in the treatment of severe hypertension in the postpartum period
    Ludwig, Elizabeth
    Frappaolo, Anna
    Bejerano, Shai
    Polin, Melanie
    Gyamfi-Bannerman, Cynthia
    Booker, Whitney A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S502 - S502
  • [6] Nifedipine or amlodipine? The choice for hypertension during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jinjin Yin
    Zhengrong Mei
    Shengying Shi
    Peili Du
    Shumin Qin
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2022, 306 : 1891 - 1900
  • [7] Nifedipine or amlodipine? The choice for hypertension during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yin, Jinjin
    Mei, Zhengrong
    Shi, Shengying
    Du, Peili
    Qin, Shumin
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2022, 306 (06) : 1891 - 1900
  • [8] Nicardipine versus Labetalol for Hypertension during Acute Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hao, Fang
    Yin, Suna
    Tang, Lina
    Zhang, Xueguang
    Zhang, Shubao
    [J]. NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2022, 70 (05) : 1793 - 1799
  • [9] Intravenous labetalol versus oral nifedipine for acute hypertension in pregnancy: effects on cerebral perfusion pressure
    Tolcher, Mary Catherine
    Fox, Karin A.
    Sangi-Haghpeykar, Haleh
    Clark, Steven
    Belfort, Michael A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S20 - S21
  • [10] Intravenous labetalol versus oral nifedipine for acute hypertension in pregnancy: effects on cerebral perfusion pressure
    Tolcher, Mary Catherine
    Fox, Karin A.
    Sangi-Haghpeykar, Haleh
    Clark, Steven L.
    Belfort, Michael A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 223 (03)