Dynamics of conflicting opinions considering rationality

被引:6
|
作者
Wang, Chaoqian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Phys, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Innovat & Entrepreneurship, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
关键词
Public opinion; Rationalization; Sociophysics; Compartment model; Stability analysis; RUMOR SPREADING MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.physa.2020.125160
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Covering a certain social topic, people may form different opinions. Some opinions are irrational (e.g. rumors), while the other opinions are of rationality. The irrational opinions are spontaneously doubted because of the irrationality, while rational opinions are solid. The propagation of different opinions is affected by people's subjective communication tendency. On this basis, we propose an SIDR compartment model consisting of susceptible individuals, irrational individuals, doubters and rational individuals. Four meaningful equilibrium states and corresponding stability conditions are theoretically analyzed. By numerical simulation, we investigate the rationalization of public opinions. The results show that, the spontaneous loss of irrationality is conducive to the reduction of irrational individuals. However, when it is cooperated with the persuasion from rational individuals, the irrationality loss not always raises the number of rational individuals. Instead, susceptible individuals will occupy considerable population, hence the impediment to rationalization. In this sense, those irrational individuals sometimes also play a positive role in rationalization, because they lead the susceptible to form an opinion (irrational though), thus makes it possible for them to have doubt and further accept the rational opinion. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dynamics of Uncertain and Conflicting Opinions in Social Networks
    Cho, Jin-Hee
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SYSTEMS, 2018, 5 (02): : 518 - 531
  • [2] Conflicting opinions
    Bremner, JP
    [J]. FORBES, 2001, 167 (01): : 26 - 26
  • [3] Conflicting opinions
    Knott, NJ
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2003, 195 (01) : 2 - 2
  • [4] Conflicting opinions
    Hayres, G
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2005, 83 (04) : 198 - 198
  • [5] Picture Fuzzy Petri Nets for Knowledge Representation and Acquisition in Considering Conflicting Opinions
    Xu, Xue-Guo
    Shi, Hua
    Xu, Dong-Hui
    Liu, Hu-Chen
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (05):
  • [6] Conflicting opinions (2)
    N J Knott
    [J]. British Dental Journal, 2003, 195 (1) : 2 - 2
  • [7] Conflicting opinions (1)
    F Moran
    [J]. British Dental Journal, 2003, 195 : 2 - 2
  • [8] CHEMISTRY AND CONFLICTING OPINIONS
    STAAB, HA
    [J]. UMSCHAU, 1986, 86 (01): : 2 - 3
  • [9] CONFLICTING OPINIONS + PALM BEACH
    ORRCAHALL, C
    [J]. HISTORIC PRESERVATION, 1978, 30 (03): : 47 - 47
  • [10] Visual analysis of conflicting opinions
    Chen, Chaomei
    Ibekwe-SanJuan, Fidelia
    SanJuan, Eric
    Weaver, Chris
    [J]. VAST 2006: IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON VISUAL ANALYTICS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 59 - +