Three-stage contingent screening for Down syndrome

被引:14
|
作者
Wright, D [1 ]
Bradbury, I
Cuckle, H
Gardosi, J
Tonks, A
Standing, S
Benn, P
机构
[1] Univ Plymouth, Dept Math & Stat, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
[2] Univ Ulster, Sch Biomed Sci, Coleraine BT52 1SA, Londonderry, North Ireland
[3] Univ Leeds, Sch Med, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Perinatal Inst, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] Birmingham Womens Hlth Trust, Dept Clin Chem, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[6] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Hlth, Dept Genet & Dev Biol, Farmington, CT USA
关键词
Down syndrome; prenatal screening; policy; modelling; sequential;
D O I
10.1002/pd.1451
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objective To demonstrate the potential value of three-stage sequential screening for Down syndrome. Methods Protocols were considered in which maternal serum pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) measurements were taken on all women in the first trimester. Those women with very low Down syndrome risks were screened negative at that stage and nuchal translucency (NT) was measured on the remainder and the risk reassessed. Those with very low risk were then screened negative and those with very high risk were offered early diagnostic testing. Those with intermediate risks received second-trimester maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, free beta-hCG, unconjugated estriol and inhibin-A. Risk was then reassessed and those with high risk were offered diagnosis. Detection rates and false-positive rates were estimated by multivariate Gaussian modelling using Monte-Carlo simulation. Results The modelling suggests that, with full adherence to a three-stage policy, overall detection rates of nearly 90% and false-positive rates below 2.0% can be achieved. Approximately two-thirds of pregnancies are screened on the basis of first-trimester biochemistry alone, five out of six women complete their screening in the first trimester, and the first-trimester detection rate is over 60%. Conclusion Three-stage contingent sequential screening is potentially highly effective for Down syndrome screening. The acceptability of this protocol and its performance in practice, should be tested in prospective studies. Copyright (C) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 534
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Three stage contingent screening for Down syndrome
    Huttly, Wayne J.
    Morris, Joan K.
    Bestwick, Jonathan P.
    Wald, Nicholas J.
    Murphy, Karl
    Pandya, Pranav P.
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2006, 26 (12) : 1183 - 1183
  • [2] Contingent screening for Down syndrome
    Wald, Nicholas J.
    Bestwick, Jonathan P.
    Canick, Jacob A.
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2008, 28 (08) : 781 - 781
  • [3] Contingent screening for Down syndrome
    Summers, AM
    Huang, TH
    Meier, C
    Farrell, SA
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2005, 25 (10) : 963 - 963
  • [4] Sequential and contingent prenatal screening for Down syndrome
    Wald, Nicholas J.
    Rudnicka, Alicja R.
    Bestwick, Jonathan P.
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2006, 26 (09) : 769 - 777
  • [5] Practical strategies in contingent sequential screening for Down syndrome
    Benn, P
    Wright, D
    Cuckle, H
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2005, 25 (08) : 645 - 652
  • [6] Three-stage Voltage Stability Contingency Screening and Ranking
    Xu, Pengfei
    Song, Dunwen
    Ma, Shiying
    Zhong, Wuzhi
    Chen, Yong
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2017 CHINA INTERNATIONAL ELECTRICAL AND ENERGY CONFERENCE (CIEEC 2017), 2017, : 412 - 417
  • [7] Contingent screening for Down syndrome - results from the FaSTER trial
    Cuckle, Howard S.
    Malone, Fergal D.
    Wright, David
    Porter, T. Flint
    Nyberg, David A.
    Comstock, Christine H.
    Saade, George R.
    Berkowitz, Richard L.
    Ferreira, Jose C.
    Dugoff, Lorraine
    Craigolo, Sabrina D.
    Timor, Ilan E.
    Carr, Stephen R.
    Wolfe, Honor M.
    D'Alton, Mary E.
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2008, 28 (02) : 89 - 94
  • [8] Prospective experience with contingent screening strategy for Down syndrome in Estonia
    Muru K.
    Sitska M.
    Asser K.
    Ehrenberg A.
    Karro H.
    Õunap K.
    Reimand T.
    [J]. Journal of Community Genetics, 2010, 1 (3) : 133 - 138
  • [9] Contingent screening for Down syndrome is an efficient alternative to non-disclosure sequential screening
    Wright, D
    Bradbury, I
    Benn, P
    Cuckle, H
    Ritchie, K
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2004, 24 (10) : 762 - 766
  • [10] Contingent screening for Down syndrome completed in the first trimester: a multicenter study
    Munoz-Cortes, M.
    Arigita, M.
    Falguera, G.
    Seres, A.
    Guix, D.
    Baldrich, E.
    Acera, A.
    Torrent, A.
    Rodriguez-Veret, A.
    Lopez-Quesada, E.
    Garcia-Moreno, R.
    Gonce, A.
    Borobio, V.
    Borrell, A.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 39 (04) : 396 - 400