Loblolly pine seedling growth after inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and ozone exposure

被引:0
|
作者
Estes, BL [1 ]
Enebak, SA [1 ]
Chappelka, AH [1 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Sch Forestry & Wildlife Sci, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1139/X04-026
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria promote plant growth and induce biocontrol, but are affected by soil type, water stress, microbial competition, and environmental conditions. One unexplored factor is the interaction of rhizobacteria-inoculated plants exposed to ozone. Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) seeds were inoculated with either Bacillus subtilis (Ehrenberg) Cohn or Paenibacillus macerans (Schardinger) Ash. In field trials, 4-week-old seedlings were exposed for 12 weeks to carbon-filtered (CF 12 ppb), 1x (46 ppb), or 2x (97 ppb) ozone for 12 h.d(-1) in open-top chambers (OTC) in 1998 and 1999. In three greenhouse trials, 5-week-old seedlings were exposed to ozone at 0x (8 ppb), 1 x (105 ppb), 2x (199 ppb), and 3x (298 ppb) for 4 h.d(-1), 5 d.week(-1) for 8 weeks in continuously stirred tank reactors (CSTR). In both the CSTRs and the OTCs, ozone-exposed seedlings exhibited 20%-50% less biomass and more foliar injury as compared with nonexposed seedlings. In CSTRs, at the 3 x exposure, B. subtilis-inoculated seedlings had 12% less foliar injury than noninoculated seedlings. Foliar injury was 65% less for B. subtilis-treated seedlings in 1998, and root surface area, total root length, and root diameter was 25%-35% greater when seedlings were exposed to 2 x ozone in the OTCs. This is the first report of rhizobacteria protecting seedlings against the negative effects of ozone exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:1410 / 1416
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on loblolly and slash pine seedlings
    Enebak, SA
    Wei, G
    Kloepper, JW
    [J]. FOREST SCIENCE, 1998, 44 (01) : 139 - 144
  • [2] YIELD AND GROWTH RESPONSE OF STRAWBERRY TO PLANT GROWTH-PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA INOCULATION
    Erturk, Y.
    Ercisli, S.
    Cakmakci, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 2012, 35 (06) : 817 - 826
  • [3] Evidence for induced systemic protection to fusiform rust in loblolly pine by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
    Enebak, SA
    Carey, WA
    [J]. PLANT DISEASE, 2000, 84 (03) : 306 - 308
  • [4] Influence of two plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on loblolly pine root respiration and IAA activity
    Vonderwell, JD
    Enebak, SA
    Samuelson, LJ
    [J]. FOREST SCIENCE, 2001, 47 (02) : 197 - 202
  • [5] Field response of legumes to inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
    Tsigie, Angaw
    Tilak, Kolluru V. B. R.
    Saxena, Anil K.
    [J]. BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 2011, 47 (08) : 971 - 974
  • [6] Field response of legumes to inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
    Angaw Tsigie
    Kolluru V. B. R. Tilak
    Anil K. Saxena
    [J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2011, 47 : 971 - 974
  • [7] Effects of inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on resident rhizosphere microorganisms
    Castro-Sowinski, Susana
    Herschkovitz, Yoav
    Okon, Yaacov
    Jurkevitch, Edouard
    [J]. FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS, 2007, 276 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [8] Effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on organic tomato seedling production
    Ozaktan, H.
    Malkoclu, M. C.
    Tuzel, Y.
    Oztekin, G. B.
    Yolageldi, L.
    [J]. III INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ORGANIC GREENHOUSE HORTICULTURE, 2017, 1164 : 63 - 68
  • [9] Effect of co-inoculation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on the growth of amaranth plants
    Chatterjee, Swagata
    Sau, Gopi Ballav
    Sinha, Sangram
    Mukherjee, Samir Kumar
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2012, 58 (12) : 1387 - 1397
  • [10] Isolation and Characterization of Three Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria for Growth Enhancement of Rice Seedling
    Zeping Liu
    Xiaolong Zhang
    Leibing Li
    Ning Xu
    Yong Hu
    Chao Wang
    Yong Shi
    Dongsheng Li
    [J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2022, 41 : 1382 - 1393