In vitro scan accuracy and time efficiency in various implant-supported fixed partial denture situations

被引:4
|
作者
Abou-Ayash, Samir [1 ,5 ]
Mathey, Amber [1 ]
Gaumann, Fabio
Mathey, Ayse [1 ]
Donmez, Mustafa Borga [1 ,2 ]
Yilmaz, Burak [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Reconstruct Dent & Gerodontol, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Istinye Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Restorat Prevent & Pediat Dent, Freiburgstr 7, CH-3007 Bern, Switzerland
[4] Ohio State Univ, Div Restorat & Prosthet Dent, Coll Dent, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Univ Bern, Dept Reconstruct Dent & Gerodontol, Freiburgstr 7, CH-3007 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
Digital workflow; Partial edentulism; Precision; Time efficiency; Trueness; CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSIONS; OPERATOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104358
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the accuracy and time efficiency of different digital workflows in 3 implant-supported fixed partial denture situations. Methods: Three partially edentulous maxillary models with 2 implants (Model 1: implants at lateral incisor sites; Model 2: implants at right canine and first molar sites; Model 3: implants at right first premolar and first molar sites) were digitized (ATOS Capsule 200MV120, n=1) for reference scans. Test scans were performed for direct (Primescan (DDW-P) and Trios 3 (DDW-T)) and indirect (IDW) digital workflows (n=14). For IDW, stone casts (type IV) were obtained from vinylsiloxanether impressions and digitized (S600 Arti). The scan/impression and post processing times were recorded. Reference and test scans were superimposed (GOM Inspect) to calculate 3D point, inter-implant distance, and angular deviations. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for trueness and precision analyses (alpha=.05). Results: Tested workflows affected trueness (P <=.030) and precision (P<.001) of scans (3D point, inter-implant distance, and angular deviations) within models. DDW-P had the highest accuracy (3D point deviations) for models 1 and 3 (P <=.046). IDW had the lowest accuracy for model 2 (P<.01). DDW-P had the highest accuracy (inter-implant distance deviations) for model 3 (P <=.048). Direct digital workflow mostly led to lower angular deviations (P <=.040), and higher precision for models 2 (mesiodistal direction) and 3 (P<.001). The time for direct digital workflow was shorter (P<.001), DDW-P being more efficient than DDW-T (P=.008). Conclusion: Direct digital workflow was more accurate and efficient than indirect digital workflow in tested partial edentulism situations with 2 implants. Clinical significance: Tested intraoral scanners can be recommended for accurate and efficient impressions of anterior and posterior 3- or 4-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In vitro scan accuracy and time efficiency in various implant-supported fixed partial denture situations
    Abou-Ayash, Samir
    Mathey, Amber
    Gaeumann, Fabio
    Mathey, Ayse
    Donmez, Mustafa Borga
    Yilmaz, Burak
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 127
  • [2] In vitro scan accuracy and time efficiency in various implant-supported fixed partial denture situations (vol 127C, 104358, 2022)
    Abou-Ayash, Samir
    Mathey, Amber
    Gaumann, Fabio
    Mathey, Ayse
    Donmez, Mustafa Borga
    Yilmaz, Burak
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2023, 128
  • [3] Intraoral Scan Accuracy and Time Efficiency in Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures: A Systematic Review
    Pullishery, Fawaz
    Huraib, Wayel
    Alruhaymi, Abdullah S.
    Alharandah, Wabel Abdulrahman
    Aldara, Elaf Waleed
    Benten, Muath Mohammed
    Alassaf, Dina Mansour
    Babatin, Wafa Mohammed A.
    Mohsen, Nagam Mohammed M.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [4] Scan accuracy and time efficiency of different implantsupported fixed partial denture situations depending on the intraoral scanner and scanned area: An in vitro study
    Donmez, Mustafa Borga
    Mathey, Ayse
    Gaumann, Fabio
    Mathey, Amber
    Yilmaz, Burak
    Abou-Ayash, Samir
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 131 (06): : 1198 - 1207
  • [5] A technique to record the gingival configuration of an interim implant-supported fixed partial denture
    Huang Yiqing
    Han Yuting
    Wang, Jiawei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2018, 120 (04): : 495 - 497
  • [6] Preload evaluation of 2 implant-supported fixed partial denture abutment designs
    Alzoubi, Fawaz M.
    Sabti, Mohammad
    Alsarraf, Esra
    Alshahrani, Faris A.
    Sadowsky, Steven J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2022, 128 (05): : 1067.e1 - 1067.e6
  • [7] Analysis of load transfer and stress distribution by an implant-supported fixed partial denture
    Assif, D
    Marshak, B
    Horowitz, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1996, 75 (03): : 285 - 291
  • [8] Stress Analysis of Implant-Supported Removable Partial Denture with Anterior Fixed Prostheses and Conventional Implant-Supported Overdentures in the Edentulous Mandible
    Ozel, Gulsum Sayin
    Ozyilmaz, Ozgun Yusuf
    Inan, Ozgur
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ORAL RESEARCH, 2022, 13 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [9] A procedure for repairing a fixed implant-supported complete denture
    Abbo, B
    Razzoog, ME
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2005, 93 (06): : 588 - 589
  • [10] Use of aluminum strips to fabricate verification jig for an implant-supported fixed partial denture
    Papazian, S
    Morgano, SM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1998, 79 (03): : 350 - 352