Systematic random sampling of the comet assay

被引:9
|
作者
McArt, Darragh G. [1 ]
Wasson, Gillian R. [1 ]
McKerr, George [1 ]
Saetzler, Kurt [1 ]
Reed, Matt [1 ]
Howard, C. Vyvyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulster, Biomed Sci Res Inst, Coleraine BT52 1SA, Londonderry, North Ireland
关键词
GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS ASSAY; MICROSCOPE STAGE; DNA; CELLS; PARTICLES; REPAIR; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1093/mutage/gep020
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The comet assay is a technique used to quantify DNA damage and repair at a cellular level. In the assay, cells are embedded in agarose and the cellular content is stripped away leaving only the DNA trapped in an agarose cavity which can then be electrophoresed. The damaged DNA can enter the agarose and migrate while the undamaged DNA cannot and is retained. DNA damage is measured as the proportion of the migratory 'tail' DNA compared to the total DNA in the cell. The fundamental basis of these arbitrary values is obtained in the comet acquisition phase using fluorescence microscopy with a stoichiometric stain in tandem with image analysis software. Current methods deployed in such an acquisition are expected to be both objectively and randomly obtained. In this paper we examine the 'randomness' of the acquisition phase and suggest an alternative method that offers both objective and unbiased comet selection. In order to achieve this, we have adopted a survey sampling approach widely used in stereology, which offers a method of systematic random sampling (SRS). This is desirable as it offers an impartial and reproducible method of comet analysis that can be used both manually or automated. By making use of an unbiased sampling frame and using microscope verniers, we are able to increase the precision of estimates of DNA damage. Results obtained from a multiple-user pooled variation experiment showed that the SRS technique attained a lower variability than that of the traditional approach. The analysis of a single user with repetition experiment showed greater individual variances while not being detrimental to overall averages. This would suggest that the SRS method offers a better reflection of DNA damage for a given slide and also offers better user reproducibility.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 378
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mixed random systematic sampling designs
    Huang, KC
    [J]. METRIKA, 2004, 59 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [2] Mixed random systematic sampling designs
    Kuo-Chung Huang
    [J]. Metrika, 2004, 59 : 1 - 11
  • [3] TWO DIMENSIONAL SYSTEMATIC SAMPLING AND THE ASSOCIATED STRATIFIED AND RANDOM SAMPLING
    Das, A. C.
    [J]. SANKHYA, 1950, 10 : 95 - 108
  • [4] SYSTEMATIC AND RANDOM DEFORMATIONS OF LONG-PERIOD COMET ORBITS
    ANTONOV, VA
    TODRIYA, ZP
    [J]. SOVIET ASTRONOMY LETTERS, 1984, 10 (03): : 166 - 166
  • [5] ON THE THEORY OF SYSTEMATIC SAMPLING .3. COMPARISON OF CENTERED AND RANDOM START SYSTEMATIC SAMPLING
    MADOW, WG
    [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1953, 24 (01): : 101 - 106
  • [6] New Application of the Comet Assay: Chromosome-Comet Assay
    Cortes-Gutierrez, Elva I.
    Davila-Rodriguez, Martha I.
    Luis Fernandez, Jose
    Lopez-Fernandez, Carmen
    Gosalbez, Altea
    Gosalvez, Jaime
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 2011, 59 (07) : 655 - 660
  • [7] SYSTEMATIC SAMPLING OF GAUSSIAN RANDOM PROCESSES AND FIELDS
    VENEZIANO, D
    QUEIROZ, CS
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1979, 15 (03) : 703 - 713
  • [8] A TEST OF RANDOM VERSUS SYSTEMATIC ECOLOGICAL SAMPLING
    BOURDEAU, PF
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1953, 34 (03) : 499 - 512
  • [9] MODIFIED SYSTEMATIC SAMPLING WITH MULTIPLE RANDOM STARTS
    Gupta, Sat
    Khan, Zaheen
    Shabbir, Javid
    [J]. REVSTAT-STATISTICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 16 (02) : 187 - 212
  • [10] Comet assay as a suitable biomarker for in vivo oral carcinogenesis: a systematic review
    Guedes Pinto, Thiago
    de Souza, Daniel Vitor
    da Silva, Glenda Nicioli
    Salvadori, Daisy Maria Favero
    Martins, Manoela Domingues
    Ribeiro, Daniel Araki
    [J]. BIOMARKERS, 2023, 28 (08) : 692 - 702