The Adequacy of Falling Object Protection Design Criteria for Feller Bunchers

被引:0
|
作者
Lyons, Kevin [1 ]
Sessions, John [2 ]
Wimer, Jeffrey [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Forest Sci Ctr, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[2] Oregon State Univ, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
关键词
impact energy; rigid body mechanics; equipment design;
D O I
10.5849/forsci.12-110
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
This article develops a model for estimating the energy transferred to the falling object protection system of a feller buncher (impact energy) by a tree falling under its own weight. The impact energy for a range of tree sizes and rotation angles to impact is estimated and compared with the WorkSafeBC design criteria for feller bunchers. For many scenarios, the impact energy is greater than the design criterion of 11.5 kJ. In addition, increasing the stiffness of the falling object protection system (FOPS) results in a minor reduction in the impact energy when the tree is free to rotate about the feller buncher. However, increasing the stiffness of the FOPS also results in a very large increase (relative to the reduction in the impact energy) of the maximum force at impact. A large impact force could be a concern when acceleration of the operator within the cab is a concern. Future work should investigate whether the design criteria should be revised to include both a maximum allowable deflection of the FOPS into the operator area under specified conditions and a maximum allowable acceleration of the operator for a given impact energy.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 763
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF LONG BOOMS FOR FELLER-BUNCHERS IN THINNING OPERATIONS
    FRIDLEY, GE
    FRIDLEY, JL
    JORGENSEN, JE
    MANN, CN
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1986, 29 (03): : 696 - 701
  • [2] AN INTERACTIVE SIMULATION FOR STUDYING THE DESIGN OF FELLER-BUNCHERS FOR FOREST THINNING
    FRIDLEY, JL
    GARBINI, JL
    JORGENSEN, JE
    PETERS, PA
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1985, 28 (03): : 680 - 686
  • [3] Test adequacy criteria for UML design models
    Andrews, A
    France, R
    Ghosh, S
    Craig, G
    [J]. SOFTWARE TESTING VERIFICATION & RELIABILITY, 2003, 13 (02): : 95 - 127
  • [4] Design for demise Protection from falling spacecraft
    David, Leonard
    [J]. AEROSPACE AMERICA, 2012, 50 (02) : 36 - 42
  • [5] Design of falling rock protection barriers using numerical models
    Gentilini, C.
    Gottardi, G.
    Govoni, L.
    Mentani, A.
    Ubertini, F.
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2013, 50 : 96 - 106
  • [6] DESIGN CRITERIA FOR LIGHTNING PROTECTION OF HV SUBSTATIONS
    PANEK, J
    ALBRECHT, PF
    ELAHI, H
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY, 1992, 7 (02) : 489 - 498
  • [7] Coal pillar design criteria for surface protection
    Hill, D
    [J]. COAL 2005: 6th Australasian Coal Operators' Conference, 2005, 2005 (02): : 31 - 37
  • [8] A REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE CRITERIA FOR DEMONSTRATING NUCLEAR-POWER-PLANT DESIGN ADEQUACY
    DINNIE, KS
    [J]. 9TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE 1988 - CANADIAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY: PROCEEDINGS, 1988, : 423 - 427
  • [9] Falling-object protective structure for tractors in service: Prototype design and validation
    Al-Bassit, Lama
    Tricot, Nicolas
    Sayegh, Simon
    [J]. BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2019, 185 : 76 - 87