Minimum energy efficiency - is the energy performance certificate a suitable foundation?

被引:12
|
作者
Organ, Samantha [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ West England, Architecture & Built Environm, Bristol, Avon, England
关键词
Energy efficiency; Energy performance certificate; Existing housing; Minimum energy efficiency standard; RESIDENTIAL SECTOR; FUEL POVERTY; TENANTS; IMPACT; UK; BUILDINGS; RETROFIT; RATINGS; POLICY; CONSUMPTION;
D O I
10.1108/IJBPA-03-2020-0016
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Purpose - Climate change is one of the most significant challenges of our time. The existing housing stock is a crucial component in achieving international and national climate change targets through energy efficiency improvements. The private rental sector incorporates some of the worst performing housing. To address this, the UK has implemented the minimum energy efficiency standard, based on the energy performance certificate rating. However, the energy performance certificate has a number of criticisms in the UK and across the EU. This viewpoints paper discusses the primary criticisms of the EPC and whether these undermine the minimum energy efficiency standard. Design/methodology/approach - This viewpoint paper draws on the recent work across academic, government and professional literature to develop a critique of the energy performance certificate and its underlying methodology as a basis on which to form the minimum energy efficiency standard. Findings - The paper concludes that based on the current form of the energy performance certificate in the UK, the minimum energy efficiency standard is likely to unfairly advantage some landlords and penalise others. This has implications for landlords, tenants and the wider housing stock. Originality/value - This paper presents a discussion of the new minimum energy efficiency standard based on the limitations of the energy performance certificate. It has implications for policymakers, researchers and practitioners in the private rental sector.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 601
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] New Challenges for Sustainability and Energy Efficiency - From Energy Performance Certificate of EnEV 2007 to Certificate for Sustainable Constructions
    Hegner, Hans-Dieter
    [J]. MAUERWERK, 2008, 12 (02) : 51 - 52
  • [2] GIS-based urban energy modelling and energy efficiency scenarios using the energy performance certificate database
    Guglielmina Mutani
    Valeria Todeschi
    [J]. Energy Efficiency, 2021, 14
  • [3] GIS-based urban energy modelling and energy efficiency scenarios using the energy performance certificate database
    Mutani, Guglielmina
    Todeschi, Valeria
    [J]. ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2021, 14 (05)
  • [4] Infrared imaging for energy performance certificate
    不详
    [J]. INSIGHT, 2007, 49 (12) : 697 - 697
  • [5] Energy retrofits of Danish homes: is the Energy Performance Certificate useful?
    Christensen, Toke Haunstrup
    Gram-Hanssen, Kirsten
    de Best-Waldhober, Marjolein
    Adjei, Afi
    [J]. BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2014, 42 (04): : 489 - 500
  • [6] With the Certificate-Rating System of Building Energy Efficiency, Accelerated the Progress of Building Energy Efficiency
    Jiang Bo
    Liu Chang-Bin
    [J]. 2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 8988 - +
  • [7] Energy Efficiency: The Implementation of Minimum Energy Performance Standard (MEPS) Application on Home Appliances for Residential
    Rahman, K. A.
    Leman, A. M.
    Mansor, L. H.
    Salleh, M. N. M.
    Yusof, M. Z. M.
    Mahathir, M. S. S.
    [J]. 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREEN DESIGN AND MANUFACTURE 2016 (ICONGDM 2016), 2016, 78
  • [8] TUV introduces energy efficiency certificate at Hannover Fair
    不详
    [J]. CONTROL ENGINEERING, 2009, 56 (05) : 22 - 22
  • [9] An analysis of errors in the Energy Performance certificate database
    Hardy, A.
    Glew, D.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 129 : 1168 - 1178
  • [10] The influence of the Energy Performance Certificate: The Dutch case
    Murphy, Lorraine
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 67 : 664 - 672