Misleading advertising and minimum quality standards

被引:10
|
作者
Hattori, Keisuke [1 ]
Higashida, Keisaku [2 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ Econ, Fac Econ, Higashiyodogawa Ku, Osaka 5338533, Japan
[2] Kwansei Gakuin Univ, Sch Econ, Nishinomiya, Hyogo 6628501, Japan
关键词
Advertising; Minimum quality standards; Misinformation; Vertical differentiation; INFORMATION; COMPETITION; DUOPOLY; SAFETY; PRICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.infoecopol.2014.04.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the relationship between misinformation about product quality and quality standards, such as minimum quality standards (MQSs) and certification criteria, when products are vertically differentiated in terms of their health/safety aspects. We investigate the welfare effect of regulating misinformation and strengthening MQSs. We find that the welfare effect of a decrease in misinformation crucially depends on the existing amount of misinformation; moreover, a more stringent MQS either improves or deteriorates welfare. Two effects figure strongly throughout our results. First, changes in misinformation and/or an MQS make price competition between firms more or less serious, causing changes in price and quantity. Second, these changes influence some consumers' choices, leading them to change the products that they purchase. This change in consumption behavior increases or decreases inappropriate choices when misinformation is present. We extend the analysis to the case in which a high-quality firm's quality investment is endogenously determined. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条