Comparison of Different In Vivo Incubation Sites to Produce Tissue-Engineered Small Intestine

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Yanchun [1 ]
Cromeens, Barrett P. [1 ]
Wang, Yijie [1 ]
Fisher, Kelli [1 ]
Johnson, Jed [2 ]
Chakroff, Jason [2 ]
Besner, Gail E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nationwide Childrens Hosp, Res Inst, Dept Pediat Surg, FB6135,700 Childrens Dr, Columbus, OH 43205 USA
[2] Nanofiber Solut Inc, Hilliard, OH USA
关键词
tissue-engineered intestine; tissue maturation; animal model; vascularized pedicle; intestinal mesentery; VISCERAL ADIPOSITY; ANASTOMOSIS; GROWTH; ANGIOGENESIS; NEOINTESTINE; SCAFFOLDS; HYDROGELS;
D O I
10.1089/ten.tea.2017.0313
中图分类号
Q813 [细胞工程];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the impact of different in vivo incubation sites on the production of tissue-engineered small intestine (TESI). Materials and Methods: Green fluorescent protein transgenic rat pups (3-5 days) were used as donors of intestinal organoids. Harvested intestine was exposed to enzymatic digestion to release intestinal stem cell-containing organoids. Organoids were purified, concentrated, and seeded onto tubular polyglycolic acid scaffolds. Seeded scaffolds were implanted in each of five locations in recipient female nude rats: wrapped with omentum, wrapped with intestinal mesentery, wrapped with uterine horn membrane, attached to the abdominal wall, and inserted into the subcutaneous space. After 4 weeks of in vivo incubation, specimens from each site were explanted for evaluation. Results: Wrapping seeded scaffolds with vascularized membranes produced TESI with variable lengths of vascularized pedicles, with the longest pedicle length from uterine horn membrane, the shortest pedicle length from intestinal mesentery, and intermediate length from omentum. The quantity of TESI, as expressed by volume and neomucosal length, was identical in TESI produced by wrapping with any of the three membranes. The smallest quantity of TESI was found in TESI produced from insertion into the subcutaneous space, with an intermediate quantity of TESI produced from attachment to the abdominal wall. Periodic acid-Schiff and immunofluorescence (IF) staining confirmed the presence of all intestinal epithelial cell lineages in TESI produced at all incubation sites. Additional IF staining demonstrated the presence of enteric nervous system components and blood vessels. Wrapping of seeded scaffolds with vascularized membranes significantly increased the density of blood vessels in the TESI produced. Conclusion: Wrapping of seeded scaffolds in vascularized membranes produced the largest quantity and highest quality of TESI. Attaching seeded scaffolds to the abdominal wall produced an intermediate quantity of TESI, but the quality was still comparable to TESI produced in vascularized membranes. Insertion of seeded scaffolds into the subcutaneous space produced the smallest quantity and lowest quality of TESI. In summary, wrapping seeded scaffolds with vascularized membranes is favorable for the production of TESI, and wrapping with omentum may produce TESI that is most easily anastomosed with host intestine.
引用
收藏
页码:1138 / 1147
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Different in vivo Incubation Sites for Production of Tissue Engineered Intestine (TEI)
    Liu, Y.
    Rager, T.
    Cromeens, B.
    Johnson, J.
    Chakroff, J.
    Besner, G. E.
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2015, 21 : S99 - S99
  • [2] Tissue-engineered small intestine
    Levin, Daniel E.
    Dreyfuss, Justin M. L.
    Grikscheit, Tracy C.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2011, 8 (06) : 673 - 675
  • [3] Lymphangiogenesis in tissue-engineered small intestine
    Duxbury, MS
    Grikscheit, TC
    Gardner-Thorpe, J
    Rocha, FG
    Ito, H
    Perez, A
    Ashley, SW
    Vacanti, JP
    Whang, EE
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 77 (08) : 1162 - 1166
  • [4] Angiogenesis in tissue-engineered small intestine
    Gardner-Thorpe, J
    Grikscheit, TC
    Ito, H
    Perez, A
    Ashley, SW
    Vacanti, JP
    Whang, EE
    TISSUE ENGINEERING, 2003, 9 (06): : 1255 - 1261
  • [5] Regenerative signals for tissue-engineered small intestine
    Kim, SS
    Kaihara, S
    Benvenuto, M
    Choi, RS
    Kim, BS
    Mooney, DJ
    Taylor, GA
    Vacanti, JP
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 31 (1-2) : 657 - 660
  • [6] Production of Tissue-Engineered Small Intestine in Rats with Different Ages of Cell Donors
    Liu, Yanchun
    Wang, Yijie
    Chakroff, Jason
    Johnson, Jed
    Farrell, Aidan
    Besner, Gail E.
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2019, 25 (11-12) : 878 - 886
  • [7] VEGF optimizes the formation of tissue-engineered small intestine
    Matthews, Jamil A.
    Sala, Frederic G.
    Speer, Allison L.
    Warburton, David
    Grikscheit, Tracy C.
    REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 6 (05) : 559 - 567
  • [8] Tissue-engineered small intestine - Ontogeny of the immune system
    Perez, A
    Grikscheit, TC
    Blumberg, RS
    Ashley, SW
    Vacanti, JP
    Whang, EE
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 74 (05) : 619 - 623
  • [9] Anastomosis between tissue-engineered intestine and native small bowel
    Kaihara, S
    Kim, SS
    Benvenuto, M
    Choi, R
    Kim, BS
    Mooney, D
    Tanaka, K
    Vacanti, JP
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 31 (1-2) : 661 - 662
  • [10] Is the tissue-engineered intestine clinically viable?
    James CY Dunn
    Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2008, 5 : 366 - 367