Contrasting human influences and macro-environmental factors on fire activity inside and outside protected areas of North America

被引:29
|
作者
Mansuy, Nicolas [1 ]
Miller, Carol [2 ]
Parisien, Marc-Andre [1 ]
Parks, Sean A. [2 ]
Batllori, Enric [3 ]
Moritz, Max A. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Nat Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Serv, Northern Forestry Ctr, 5320-122nd St, Edmonton, AB T6H 3S5, Canada
[2] US Forest Serv, USDA, Aldo Leopold Wilderness Res Inst, Rocky Mt Res Stn, 790 E Beckwith Ave, Missoula, MT 59801 USA
[3] CREAF Cerdanyola Valles, E-08913 Barcelona, Spain
[4] Univ Calif Cooperat Extens, Agr & Nat Resources Div, Davis, CA 95618 USA
[5] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Bren Sch Environm Sci & Management, Bren Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2019年 / 14卷 / 06期
关键词
human footprint; MaxEnt; land use; altered fire regimes; adaptive fire management; wilderness; SIERRA-NEVADA; REGIME SHIFTS; CLIMATE; MANAGEMENT; WILDFIRE; FOREST; LAND; CONSERVATION; IMPACTS; AFRICAN;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/ab1bc5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Human activities threaten the effectiveness of protected areas (PAs) in achieving their conservation goals across the globe. In this study, we contrast the influence of human and macro-environmental factors driving fire activity inside and outside PAs. Using area burned between 1984 and 2014 for 11 ecoregions in Canada and the United States, we built and compared statistical models of fire likelihood using the MaxEnt software and a set of 11 key anthropogenic, climatic, and physical variables. Overall, the full model (i.e. including all variables) performed better (adjusted area under the curve ranging from 0.71 to 0.95 for individual ecoregions) than the model that excluded anthropogenic variables. Both model types (with and without anthropogenic variables) generally performed better inside than outside the PAs. Climatic variables were usually of foremost importance in explaining fire activity inside and outside PAs, with anthropogenic variables being the second most important predictors, even inside PAs. While the individual contributions of anthropogenic variables indicate that fire activity decreased as of function of increasing human footprint, the anthropogenic effects were often substantially greater than those of physical features and were comparable to or even greater than climatic effects in some densely developed ecoregions, both outside and within PAs (e.g. Mediterranean California, Eastern Temperate Forest, and Tropical Wet Forests). Together, these results show the pervasive impact of humans on fire regimes inside PAs, as well as outside PAs. Given the increasing attractiveness of PAs, the implications for adaptive fire management beyond the concept of naturalness in the PAs are discussed. Our assessment of human-altered fire activity could serve as an indicator of human pressure in PAs; however, we suggest that further analysis is needed to understand specific interactions among fire, human pressures, and the environmental conditions at the scale of PAs.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据