Marginality, ethnicity and penality: a response to Loic Wacquant

被引:2
|
作者
Wilson, William Julius [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Hutchins Ctr, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
theoretical mechanisms; precarity; precariat; neo-liberalism; habitus; bureaucratic field; inequality;
D O I
10.1080/01419870.2014.931985
中图分类号
C95 [民族学、文化人类学];
学科分类号
0304 ; 030401 ;
摘要
This article responds to Loic Wacquant's elaboration of his overarching theoretical framework in his stimulating article 'Marginality, Ethnicity and Penality in the Neo-liberal City: An Analytic Cartography'. I raise some issues that he might reflect on in his rejoinder to the comments on his essay. These include: (1) the need for greater specification and clarification of explanatory and conceptual variables in the elaboration of his theoretical framework, especially theoretical mechanisms and two key concepts, 'precariat' and 'neo-liberal policy'; and (2) addressing a major study offering empirically based arguments that indirectly challenge assertions in his theoretical framework.
引用
收藏
页码:1712 / 1718
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条