Neural basis of the Stroop interference task: Response competition or selective attention?

被引:108
|
作者
Mead, LA [1 ]
Mayer, AR [1 ]
Bobholz, JA [1 ]
Woodley, SJ [1 ]
Cunningham, JM [1 ]
Hammeke, TA [1 ]
Rao, SM [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Div Neuropsychol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
Stroop; fMRI; inferior frontal gyrus; anterior cingulate gyrus;
D O I
10.1017/S1355617702860015
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Previous neuroimaging studies of the Stroop task have postulated that the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) plays a critical role in resolution of the Stroop interference condition. However, activation of the ACC is not invariably seen and appears to depend on a variety of methodological factors, including the degree of response conflict and response expectancies. The present functional MRI study was designed to identify those brain areas critically involved in the interference condition. Healthy subjects underwent a blocked-trial design fMRI experiment while responding to I of 3 stimulus conditions: (1) incongruent color words, (2) congruent color words, and (3) color-neutral words. Subjects responded to the printed color of the word via a manual response. Compared to the congruent and neutral conditions, the incongruent condition produced significant activation within the left inferior precentral sulcus (IpreCS) located on the border between the inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis (BA 44) and the ventral premotor region (BA 6). Significant deactivations in the rostral component of the ACC and the posterior cingulate gyrus were also observed. Selective activation of the left IpreCS is compatible with findings from previous neuroimaging, lesion, electrophysiological, and behavioral studies and is presumably related to the mediation of competing articulatory demands during the interference condition.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 742
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Selective attention and response set in the Stroop task
    Lamers, Martijn J. M.
    Roelofs, Ardi
    Rabeling-Keus, Inge M.
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2010, 38 (07) : 893 - 904
  • [2] Selective attention and response set in the Stroop task
    Martijn J. M. Lamers
    Ardi Roelofs
    Inge M. Rabeling-Keus
    [J]. Memory & Cognition, 2010, 38 : 893 - 904
  • [3] Neural Substrates Underlying Selective Attention in a Stroop Task
    Tam, Angela
    Luedke, Angela C.
    Fernandez-Ruiz, Juan
    Garcia, Angeles
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2012, 66 (04): : 275 - 275
  • [4] Stroop interference and disorders of selective attention
    Kingma, A
    La Heij, W
    Fasotti, L
    Eling, P
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1996, 34 (04) : 273 - 281
  • [5] SELECTIVE AND DIVIDED ATTENTION IN A STROOP TASK
    LOWE, DG
    MITTERER, JO
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1982, 36 (04): : 684 - 700
  • [6] Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference
    Kane, MJ
    Engle, RW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2003, 132 (01) : 47 - 70
  • [7] SELECTIVE ATTENTION - DIFFERENCES BETWEEN STROOP AND GARNER INTERFERENCE
    POMERANTZ, JR
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1985, 23 (04) : 290 - 290
  • [8] Dissociating selective attention and stress in the stroop interference paradigm
    Taylor, SF
    Kornblum, S
    Koeppe, RA
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1996, 39 (07) : 239 - 239
  • [9] Neural correlates of stimulus and response interference in a 2-1 mapping stroop task
    Chen, Antao
    Bailey, Kira
    Tiernan, Brandy N.
    West, Robert
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 80 (02) : 129 - 138
  • [10] Stroop interference and the timing of selective response activation
    Lansbergen, Marieke M.
    Kenemans, J. Leon
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 119 (10) : 2247 - 2254