De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients Need Higher Doses of Advagraf Compared With Prograf to Get Therapeutic Levels

被引:65
|
作者
Crespo, M. [1 ]
Mir, M.
Marin, M.
Hurtado, S.
Estadella, C.
Guri, X.
Rap, O.
Moral, R.
Puig, J. M.
Lloveras, J.
机构
[1] Hosp del Mar, Serv Nefrol, Dept Nephrol, Barcelona 08003, Spain
关键词
TACROLIMUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.05.014
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction. Advagraf is a new modified-release once-daily formulation of tacrolimus with a similar efficacy and safety profile to twice-daily tacrolimus (Prograf) according to clinical trials. Few data are published about its use in clinical practice, outside of sponsored clinical trials. We compared efficacy and basic pharmacokinetics of once-daily and twice-daily tacrolimus in de novo renal transplantation. Methods. The Advagraf group included 26 de novo renal cases who had received initial immunosuppression with once-daily tacrolimus (0.2 mg/kg from day 1 posttransplantation) combined with mycophenolic acid, steroids, and anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies (2 doses). We compared them with a Prograf group of 26 transplants performed immediately before, who received equivalent immunosuppression with twice-daily tacrolimus (0.2 mg/kg from day 1). Results. We did not observe significant differences between groups in demographics, efficacy, and basic pharmacokinetics, namely, tacrolimus trough levels at 7, 15, 30, 60, or 90 days. We found that recipients on Advagraf needed significantly higher tacrolimus doses per kg up to 6 months post-transplantation than those on Prograf: 0.16 vs 0.11; 0.14 vs 0.08; and 0.12 vs 0.08 mg/kg at 1, 3, and 6 months. No patient suffered severe liver dysfunction. There were no differences between groups in the administration of drugs interacting with CYP3A4 or prokinetics, which could alter tacrolimus pharmacokinetics. Conclusions. Among de novo renal cases, the new once-daily formulation of tacrolimus offered a similar short-term efficacy profile as the twice-daily tacrolimus. But it was necessary to use up to a 50% higher dose of Advagraf than Prograf to achieve similar trough levels during the first 6 months.
引用
收藏
页码:2115 / 2117
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In the Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients Higher Dosis of Advagraf® Compared to Prograf® Are Needed To Get Therapeutic Levels.
    Crespo, Marta
    Mir, Marisa
    Hurtado, Sara
    Guri, Xavier
    Estadella, Concepcion
    Rap, Oana
    Marin, Monica
    Maria Lloveras, Josep
    Maria Puig, Josep
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 9 : 410 - 410
  • [2] Advagraf de Novo. Use Comparative of Advagraf Compared with Prograf
    Arriola, Mariano
    Gaite, Luis E.
    Favalli, Claudia
    Agusti, Joaquin
    Paladini, Jose H.
    Gaite, Judit
    Cassini, Evelin
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 102 : S596 - S596
  • [3] Advagraf® with or without an induction therapy for de novo kidney-transplant recipients
    Noble, Johan
    Jouve, Thomas
    Rostaing, Lionel
    Malvezzi, Paolo
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2018, 14 (06) : 461 - 467
  • [4] Clinical Impact of Conversion from Prograf to Advagraf in Simultaneous Kidney-Pancreas Transplant Recipients
    Falconer, S. J.
    Oniscu, G. C.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 94 (10) : 774 - 774
  • [5] Switching from Prograf® to Advagraf® in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients-Do Asians Differ?
    Ramasamy, Dheepa
    Wong, Hin Seng
    Yakob, Suryati
    Ideris, Khairiyah
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 102 : S591 - S591
  • [6] Extended Comparison of Therapeutic Treatment Outcomes of De Novo Liver and Kidney Transplant Recipients with Generic Tacrolimus (Sandoz™) or Brand Name (Prograf®)
    Heldenbrand, S.
    Jones, G. D.
    Bornhorst, J.
    Payakachat, N.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 12 : 240 - 240
  • [7] Significant Lower Trough Level after Conversion from Prograf to Advagraf in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Wu, M. -J.
    Cheng, C. -Y.
    Shu, K. -H.
    Chen, C. -H.
    Cheng, C. -H.
    Yu, D. -M.
    Chuang, Y. -W.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 11 : 355 - 355
  • [8] Conversion From Prograf to Advagraf Among Kidney Transplant Recipients Results in Sustained Decrease in Tacrolimus Exposure
    Hougardy, Jean-Michel
    Broeders, Nilufer
    Kianda, Mireille
    Massart, Annick
    Madhoun, Phillippe
    Le Moine, Alain
    Hoang, Anh-Dung
    Mikhalski, Dimitri
    Wissing, Karl M.
    Abramowicz, Daniel
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 91 (05) : 566 - 569
  • [9] Lower Variability of Tacrolimus Trough Concentration After Conversion From Prograf to Advagraf in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Wu, Ming-Ju
    Cheng, Ching-Yao
    Chen, Cheng-Hsu
    Wu, Wen-Pyng
    Cheng, Chi-Hung
    Yu, Dong-Ming
    Chuang, Ya-Wen
    Shu, Kuo-Hsiung
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 92 (06) : 648 - 652
  • [10] Advagraf vs. Prograf as Immunosuppressive Therapy in De Novo Renal Transplant Immunosuppressive Therapy: A Single Centre Experience
    Todeschini, P.
    Comai, G.
    Sgarlato, V.
    D'Arcangelo, Liviano G.
    Dalmastri, V.
    Cappuccilli, M. L.
    Scolari, M. P.
    Stefoni, S.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 94 (10) : 973 - 973