Impact of DNA purification method and primer selection on 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding on wine

被引:3
|
作者
Cerutti, Francesco [1 ]
Cravero, Diego [1 ]
Costantini, Antonella [2 ]
Pulcini, Laura [2 ]
Modesto, Paola [3 ]
Acutis, Pier Luigi [1 ]
Vaudano, Enrico [2 ]
Peletto, Simone [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Piemonte Liguria &, Via Bologna 148, I-10154 Turin, Italy
[2] Consiglio Ric Agr & Anal Econ Agr, Ctr Ric Viticoltura & Enol, Via Pietro Micca 35, I-14100 Asti, Italy
[3] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Piemonte Liguria &, Piazza Borgo Pila 39-24, I-16129 Genoa, Italy
关键词
wine microbiota wine DNA purification; 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding; wine NGS; wine microbial community;
D O I
10.20870/oeno-one.2019.53.3.2368
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Aim: The high-throughput sequencing methods have revolutionized the study of the microbiota in different matrices including those of the grapevine production chain. DNA extraction is a crucial step in the sample processing. In this study, we compared different DNA purification methods and two primer sets for 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding to evaluate the best protocol to explore the wine microbiota by metabarcoding. Methods and results: We collected a wine from Barbera grapes after malolactic fermentation previously inoculated by Oenococcus oeni starter. The same sample was used to evaluate the best performing protocol to study the wine microbiota. DNA was purified using nine different methods and then amplified for the 16S rRNA gene with two primer sets (according to Illumina or Earth Microbiome Project protocols). The obtained amplicons were then sequenced in a single sequencing session on an Illumina MiSeq. We evaluated the best protocol considering DNA concentration and purity, alpha (Observed species) and beta diversity from metabarcoding analysis. The sequencing generated 36,031,756 reads in total. Although no statistically significant difference was observed between purification methods or primer sets, better results were obtained with phenol-chloroform DNA purification combined to Earth Microbiome Project primers. Metabarcoding was able to highlight the domination of the inoculum, O. oeni, representing the main species of the analyzed wine microbiota. Conclusion: Our data show that, for the tested wine, metabarcoding output is more influenced by the primer set than by the DNA purification method. Moreover, the metabarcoding detected that O. oeni represents the main species, evidencing the domination of the inoculum done with lyophilized commercial preparation of this species. Other lactic acid bacteria are present at a much lower abundance. Significance and impact of the study: This is the fast report applying the 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding to study the microbiota of wine. For this reason, the evaluation of alternative methods for DNA processing is essential for future research using this innovative methodology.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 517
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform
    Fiona Fouhy
    Adam G. Clooney
    Catherine Stanton
    Marcus J. Claesson
    Paul D. Cotter
    [J]. BMC Microbiology, 16
  • [2] 16S rRNA gene sequencing of mock microbial populations- impact of DNA extraction method, primer choice and sequencing platform
    Fouhy, Fiona
    Clooney, Adam G.
    Stanton, Catherine
    Claesson, Marcus J.
    Cotter, Paul D.
    [J]. BMC MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 16
  • [3] Latitudinal variation in the potential activity of Atlantic Ocean bacterioplankton revealed through 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding
    Allen, Ro
    Bird, Kimberley E.
    Murrell, J. Colin
    Cunliffe, Michael
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [4] Primer, Pipelines, Parameters: Issues in 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
    Abellan-Schneyder, Isabel
    Matchado, Monica S.
    Reitmeier, Sandra
    Sommer, Alina
    Sewald, Zeno
    Baumbach, Jan
    List, Markus
    Neuhaus, Klaus
    [J]. MSPHERE, 2021, 6 (01)
  • [5] Impact of 16S rRNA Gene Redundancy and Primer Pair Selection on the Quantification and Classification of Oral Microbiota in Next-Generation Sequencing
    Regueira-Iglesias, Alba
    Vazquez-Gonzalez, Lara
    Balsa-Castro, Carlos
    Blanco-Pintos, Triana
    Vila-Blanco, Nicolas
    Jose Carreira, Maria
    Tomas, Inmaculada
    [J]. MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2023, 11 (02):
  • [6] Evaluation of 96-well high-throughput DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding
    Chapuis, Marie-Pierre
    Benoit, Laure
    Galan, Maxime
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2023, 23 (07) : 1509 - 1525
  • [7] Conservative Fragments in Bacterial 16S rRNA Genes and Primer Design for 16S Ribosomal DNA Amplicons in Metagenomic Studies
    Wang, Yong
    Qian, Pei-Yuan
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (10):
  • [8] 16S rRNA Gene Primer Validation for Bacterial Diversity Analysis of Vegetable Products
    Nakano, Miyo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2018, 81 (05) : 848 - 859
  • [9] Absolute quantitation of microbes using 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding: A rapid normalization of relative abundances by quantitative PCR targeting a 16S rRNA gene spike-in standard
    Zemb, Olivier
    Achard, Caroline S.
    Hamelin, Jerome
    De Almeida, Marie-Lea
    Gabinaud, Beatrice
    Cauquil, Laurent
    Verschuren, Lisanne M. G.
    Godon, Jean-Jacques
    [J]. MICROBIOLOGYOPEN, 2020, 9 (03):
  • [10] Comparative analyses of eight primer sets commonly used to target the bacterial 16S rRNA gene for marine metabarcoding-based studies
    Lee, Hyeon Been
    Jeong, Dong Hyuk
    Cho, Byung Cheol
    Park, Jong Soo
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2023, 10