SIZE study: study protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of an interarcuair decompression versus extended decompression in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication caused by lumbar spinal stenosis

被引:2
|
作者
Sharma, Arjun Jamie [1 ]
Gadjradj, Pravesh S. [2 ,3 ]
Peul, Wilco C. [2 ,3 ]
van Tulder, Maurits W. [4 ]
Moojen, Wouter A. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
Harhangi, Biswadjiet S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Neurosurg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Univ Neurosurg Ctr Holland, Med Ctr, Neurosurg, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Hague Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Hlth Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Med Ctr Haaglanden, Neurosurg, The Hague, Netherlands
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 10期
关键词
neurosurgery; spine; MORRIS DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE; LOW-BACK-PAIN; NATURAL-HISTORY; LAMINECTOMY; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; RELIABILITY; INSTABILITY; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036818
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Intermittent neurogenic claudication (INC) is often caused by lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Laminectomy is considered a frequently used surgical technique for LSS. Previous studies have shown that laminectomy can potentially cause lumbar instability. Less invasive techniques, preserving midline structures including the bilateral small size interarcuair decompression, are currently applied. Due to lack of evidence and consensus, surgeons have to rely on their training and own experiences to choose the best surgical techniques for their patients. Hence, an observer and patient blinded multicentre, randomised controlled trial was designed to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bilateral interarcuair decompression versus laminectomy for LSS. Methods and analysis 174 patients above 40 years with at least 12 weeks of INC will be recruited. Patients are eligible for inclusion if they have a clinical indication for surgery for INC with an MRI showing signs of LSS. Patients will be randomised to laminectomy or bilateral interarcuair decompression. The primary outcome is functional status measured with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire at 12 months. Secondary outcomes consist of pain intensity, self-perceived recovery, functional status measured with the Oswestry Disability Index and a physical examination. Outcome measurement moments will be scheduled at 3 and 6 weeks, and at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months after surgery. Physical examination will be performed at 6 weeks, and 12, 24 and 48 months. An economic evaluation will be performed and questionnaires will be used to collect cost data. Ethics and dissemination The Medical Ethical Committee of the Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam approved this study (NL.65826.078.18). The results will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomised controlled trial
    Moojen, Wouter A.
    Arts, Mark P.
    Jacobs, Wilco C. H.
    van Zwet, Erik W.
    van den Akker-van Marle, M. Elske
    Koes, Bart W.
    Vleggeert-Lankamp, Carmen L. A. M.
    Peul, Wilco C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 49 (02) : 135 - 135
  • [2] The effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic decompression compared with open decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a multicenter, prospective, cohort study
    Shuheng Zhai
    Wenkui Zhao
    Bin Zhu
    Xin Huang
    Chen Liang
    Bao Hai
    Lixiang Ding
    Hongwei Zhu
    Xianhai Wang
    Feng Wei
    Hongling Chu
    Xiaoguang Liu
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23
  • [3] The effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic decompression compared with open decompression and fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a multicenter, prospective, cohort study
    Zhai, Shuheng
    Zhao, Wenkui
    Zhu, Bin
    Huang, Xin
    Liang, Chen
    Hai, Bao
    Ding, Lixiang
    Zhu, Hongwei
    Wang, Xianhai
    Wei, Feng
    Chu, Hongling
    Liu, Xiaoguang
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [4] Efficacy of acupuncture for treatment of intermittent claudication in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Zhou, Jing
    Liu, Sixing
    Sun, Yuanjie
    Wang, Weiming
    Liu, Zhishun
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [5] Efficacy of acupuncture for treatment of intermittent claudication in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Jing Zhou
    Sixing Liu
    Yuanjie Sun
    Weiming Wang
    Zhishun Liu
    Trials, 21
  • [6] A comparative study of Lumbar Decompression and Fusion with Internal Fixation versus Simple Decompression in elderly patients with two-segment Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Tu, Pengfa
    Cao, Shuo
    Jiang, Chenyang
    Yan, Chong-chao
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 37 (01) : 256 - 260
  • [7] Minimally Invasive Decompression Versus X-Stop in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study
    Lonne, Greger
    Johnsen, Lars Gunnar
    Rossvoll, Ivar
    Andresen, Hege
    Storheim, Kjersti
    Zwart, John Anker
    Nygaard, Oystein P.
    SPINE, 2015, 40 (02) : 77 - 85
  • [8] (Cost-)effectiveness of lower extremity nerve decompression surgery in subjects with diabetes: the DeCompression (DECO) trial-study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Rinkel, Willem D.
    Fakkel, Tirzah M.
    Cabezas, Manuel Castro
    Birnie, Erwin
    Coert, J. Henk
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (04):
  • [9] X-Stop Resulted in a Higher Reoperation Rate Than Minimally Invasive Decompression, But Both Decreased Symptoms of Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Huddleston, Paul
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 97A (22): : 1889 - 1889
  • [10] Superior outcomes of decompression with an interlaminar dynamic device versus decompression alone in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and back pain: a cross registry study
    C Röder
    B. Baumgärtner
    U. Berlemann
    E. Aghayev
    European Spine Journal, 2015, 24 : 2228 - 2235