Biological activity of pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) influenced by chickpea genotypes

被引:4
|
作者
Bheemaraya [1 ]
Rachappa, V [1 ]
Teggelli, Raju [1 ]
Yelshetty, Suhas [1 ]
Amaresh, Y. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Agr Sci, Agr Res Stn, Dept Agr Entomol, Raichur 560065, Karnataka, India
关键词
Antibiosis; Chickpea; Larvae; Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner); CICER-ARIETINUM-L; WILD RELATIVES; RESISTANCE; LEPIDOPTERA; NOCTUIDAE; ANTIBIOSIS; MECHANISM; LARVAE;
D O I
10.18805/LR-3988
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Investigations on biological activities of pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on 20 promising chickpea genotypes using detached leaf assay method at Agriculture Research Station Kalaburagi, UAS, Raichur, Karnataka was carried out during rabi 2016-17. The results revealed that at vegetative and flowering stage there was significantly lesser larval survival (70 to 76.67 %), larval weight (8.37 to 8.90 mg) and damage rate (3.67 to 4.67 of visual Rating in 1-9 Scale) on resistant check ICCL 86111, HC-1 and DBGV-3104 genotypes where as maximum per cent larval survival (86.67 to 90 %), larval weight (13.60 to 14.10 mg) and damage rate (7.67 to 8.00 of visual Rating in 1-9 Scale) was recorded in susceptible checks (ICC-3137, A-1 and JG-11). During pod formation stage, highest weight gain by larvae was noticed on susceptible check ICC-3137 (409.18 mg), on the contrary lowest weight gain by larvae was found on resistant check ICCL-86111 (275.43 mg) also these genotypes recorded more amount of malic acid and trichomes indicating that biological activity of insect was affected through antibiosis mechanism which is one of the component of resistance to H. armigera in chickpea.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 425
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVALUATION OF ADVANCED CHICKPEA GENOTYPES FOR RESISTANCE TO POD BORER, HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA (HUBNER) (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE)
    Nadeem, S.
    Shafique, M.
    Hamed, M.
    Atta, B. M.
    Shah, T. M.
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2010, 47 (02): : 132 - 135
  • [2] ESTIMATION OF YIELD LOSSES BY POD BORER HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA (HUBNER) ON CHICKPEA
    Deshmukh, S. G.
    Sureja, B. V.
    Jethva, D. M.
    Chatar, V. P.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2010, 33 (01) : 67 - 69
  • [3] Performance of Some Advance Desi Chickpea Genotypes against Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) Resistance
    Shafique, Muhammad
    Nadeem, Sajid
    Hamed, Muhammad
    Atta, Babar Manzoor
    Shah, Tariq Mahmud
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2009, 41 (04) : 277 - 280
  • [4] FIELD SCREENING OF CHICKPEA GERMPLASMS AGAINST POD BORER, HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA (HUBNER)
    Deshmukh, S. G.
    Sureja, B. V.
    Jethva, D. M.
    Sonune, V. R.
    Joshi, M. D.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2010, 33 (02) : 150 - 151
  • [5] Impact of Intercrop Combinations in the Management of Gram Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) in Chickpea
    Mehra, Keshav
    Singh, Veer
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2022, 45 (07) : 926 - 929
  • [6] SCREENING OF GREENGRAM GENOTYPES FOR RESISTANCE AGAINST GRAM POD BORER, HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA (HUBNER)
    Umbarkar, P. S.
    Parsana, G. J.
    Jethva, D. M.
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2011, 34 (01) : 71 - 72
  • [7] Evaluation of new generation pesticides to control pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) infesting chickpea
    Lekha
    Ameta, O. P.
    Swami, Hemant
    LEGUME RESEARCH, 2017, 40 (02) : 384 - 387
  • [8] Management of chickpea pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) through Nuclear Polyhedral Virus isolates
    Kambrekar, D. N.
    Kulkarni, K. A.
    Giraddi, R. S.
    Kulkarni, J. H.
    Fakrudin, B.
    PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2009, 10 (05) : 450 - 457
  • [9] Management of chickpea pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) through Nuclear Polyhedral Virus isolates
    D. N. Kambrekar
    K. A. Kulkarni
    R. S. Giraddi
    J. H. Kulkarni
    B. Fakrudin
    Precision Agriculture, 2009, 10 : 450 - 457
  • [10] BIO-EFFICACY OF NEWER INSECTICIDE MOLECULES AGAINST POD BORER, HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA (HUBNER) IN CHICKPEA
    Basavanneppa, B. B.
    Balikai, R. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND STATISTICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 12 (01): : 147 - 152