Spinal reciprocal inhibition in human locomotion

被引:39
|
作者
Kido, A
Tanaka, N
Stein, RB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Ctr Neurosci, Heritage Med Res Ctr 513, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada
[2] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Rehabil Med, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[3] Univ Alberta, Dept Physiol, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada
关键词
antagonist muscle nerve stimulation; walking; running;
D O I
10.1152/japplphysiol.01060.2003
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper was to study spinal inhibition during several different motor tasks in healthy human subjects. The short-latency, reciprocal inhibitory pathways from the common peroneal (CP) nerve to the soleus muscle and from the tibial nerve to the tibialis anterior muscle were studied as a depression of ongoing voluntary electromyograph (EMG) activity. First, the effect of stimulus intensity on the amount of inhibition was examined to decide an appropriate stimulation to study the task-dependent modulation of inhibition. Then, the inhibition at one level of stimulation (1.5 x motor threshold) was investigated during standing, walking, and running. The change in slope of inhibition vs. EMG level, which approximates the fraction of ongoing activity that is inhibited, decreased with CP stimulation from 0.52 during standing to 0.30 during fast walking (6 km/h) to 0.17 during running at 9 km/h. Similarly, the slope decreased with tibial nerve stimulation from 0.68 (standing) to 0.42 (fast walking) to 0.35 (running at 9 km/h). All differences, except the last one, were highly significant (P<0.01, Student's t-test). However, the difference between walking (0.42) and running (0.36)at the same speed (6 km/h) was not significant with tibial nerve stimulation and only significant at P<0.05 with CP nerve stimulation (0.30, 0.20). Also, the difference between standing (0.52) and slow walking (3 km/h; 0.41) with CP stimulation was not significant, but it was significant (P<0.01) with tibial nerve stimulation (0.68, 0.49). In conclusion, our findings indicate that spinal reciprocal inhibition decreases substantially with increasing speed and only changes to a lesser extent with task.
引用
收藏
页码:1969 / 1977
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RECIPROCAL INHIBITION OF SPINAL MOTONEURONS
    DONTAS, AS
    PETERS, DC
    GESELL, R
    [J]. FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS, 1951, 10 (01) : 36 - 36
  • [2] Reduced reciprocal inhibition during assisted stepping in human spinal cord injury
    Knikou, Maria
    Mummidisetty, Chaithanya K.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 2011, 231 (01) : 104 - 112
  • [3] Fast Silencing Reveals a Lost Role for Reciprocal Inhibition in Locomotion
    Moult, Peter R.
    Cottrell, Glen A.
    Li, Wen-Chang
    [J]. NEURON, 2013, 77 (01) : 129 - 140
  • [4] RECIPROCAL IA INHIBITION IN PATIENTS WITH SPINAL SPASTICITY
    BOORMAN, G
    HULLIGER, M
    LEE, RG
    TAKO, K
    TANAKA, R
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1991, 127 (01) : 57 - 60
  • [5] RECIPROCAL INHIBITION IN THE HUMAN FOREARM
    ROTHWELL, J
    DAY, B
    OBESO, J
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1981, 52 (03): : S75 - S75
  • [6] ACTIVITY OF INTERNEURONS MEDIATING RECIPROCAL 1A INHIBITION DURING LOCOMOTION
    FELDMAN, AG
    ORLOVSKY, GN
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 1975, 84 (02) : 181 - 194
  • [7] Reciprocal Ia inhibition in patients with asymmetric spinal spasticity
    Okuma, Y
    Mizuno, Y
    Lee, RG
    [J]. MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2002, 17 : S336 - S336
  • [8] Reciprocal Ia inhibition in patients with asymmetric spinal spasticity
    Okuma, Y
    Mizuno, Y
    Lee, RG
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 113 (02) : 292 - 297
  • [9] Axon projections of reciprocal inhibitory interneurons in the spinal cord of young Xenopus tadpoles and implications for the pattern of inhibition during swimming locomotion.
    Yoshida, M
    Roberts, A
    Soffe, SR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1997, 504P : P117 - P117
  • [10] Vertebral morphology, locomotion, and human spinal health
    Plomp, Kimberly A.
    Vidarsdottir, Una Strand
    Weston, Darlene
    Collard, Mark
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2014, 153 : 209 - 209