Individual differences in visuospatial working memory capacity influence the modality effect

被引:16
|
作者
Greenberg, Kevin [1 ]
Zheng, Robert [1 ]
Gardner, Michael [1 ]
Orr, Matthew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Educ Psychol, 1721 Campus Ctr Dr SAEC,3220 S, Salt Lake City, UT 84109 USA
关键词
modality effect; multimedia learning; problem‐ solving; retention; visuospatial working memory; COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY; EXECUTIVE ATTENTION; MULTIMEDIA; SPAN;
D O I
10.1111/jcal.12519
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The cognitive theory of multimedia learning postulates learning information in a dual-modality design is more effective than in a single modality, which is known as the modality effect. Research has found that the modality effect supports problem-solving learning, but not retention-based learning. This divergence in findings can be explained by the mediating effects of individual differences in visuospatial working memory. The current study confirmed the modality effect, showing superiority of dual-modality over single modality. Results revealed a significant interaction between visuospatial working memory and modality by retention, but no such interaction was obtained for problem solving. It was found that learners with low visuospatial working memory scored higher on retention in dual modality than these in single modality. Interestingly, no differences were found for learners with high visuospatial working memory on retention in both single- and dual-modality conditions. The findings may explain for whom the modality effect works in relation to retention. Finally, the analysis showed no association between modality conditions and subtypes of cognitive load, that is, extraneous and germane cognitive load.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 744
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Individual Differences in Visuospatial Working Memory Capacity and Distractor Inhibition
    Lecerf, Thierry
    Roulin, Jean-Luc
    [J]. SWISS JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 68 (02): : 67 - 78
  • [2] Individual differences in the fan effect and working memory capacity
    Bunting, MF
    Conway, ARA
    Heitz, RP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2004, 51 (04) : 604 - 622
  • [3] Trial distinctiveness in visuospatial working memory: effects on individual differences
    Lilienthal, Lindsey
    Denz, Victoria R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 31 (07) : 683 - 690
  • [4] Individual differences in proactive interference in verbal and visuospatial working memory
    Lilienthal, Lindsey
    [J]. MEMORY, 2017, 25 (08) : 1110 - 1116
  • [5] Individual differences in working memory capacity and workload capacity
    Yu, Ju-Chi
    Chang, Ting-Yun
    Yang, Cheng-Ta
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [6] Individual differences in working memory capacity and enumeration
    Tuholski, SW
    Engle, RW
    Baylis, GC
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2001, 29 (03) : 484 - 492
  • [7] Precrastination and individual differences in working memory capacity
    Raghunath, Nisha
    Fournier, Lisa R.
    Kogan, Clark
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2021, 85 (05): : 1970 - 1985
  • [8] Precrastination and individual differences in working memory capacity
    Nisha Raghunath
    Lisa R. Fournier
    Clark Kogan
    [J]. Psychological Research, 2021, 85 : 1970 - 1985
  • [9] Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Filtering
    Robison, Matthew K.
    Miller, Ashley L.
    Unsworth, Nash
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2018, 44 (07) : 1038 - 1053
  • [10] Individual differences in working memory capacity and enumeration
    Stephen W. Tuholski
    Randall W. Engle
    Gordon C. Baylis
    [J]. Memory & Cognition, 2001, 29 : 484 - 492