Slicing cut marks on animal bones: Diagnostics for identifying stone tool type and raw material

被引:84
|
作者
Greenfield, Haskel J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1179/009346906791071972
中图分类号
K85 [文物考古];
学科分类号
0601 ;
摘要
Butchering implements leave identifying signatures on bones. From these signatures, it is possible to distinguish the different raw materials and types of chipped stone butchering tools. The results of recent experiments enable us to distinguish the different types of raw materials and tools used in the butchering process, in particular those implements that produce slicing cut marks. Three types of chipped stone tools (blades, flakes, and side scrapers) and raw materials (flint, obsidian, and quartzite), as well as issues relevant to lithic production and use were examined and tested. Silicone molds of cut marks produced by each of the instruments were made and subjected to analysis in light optical and scanning electron microscopes under various levels of magnification. The criteria used for distinguishing tool type, raw material, type of production and use characteristics of the respective cutting instruments are presented, as well as a discussion of the application of the experimental results to the Early Bronze Age I site of Afridar, Israel. The data from Afridar indicate that almost all of the butchering marks on animal bones from the site were made by stone tools, in particular haphazardly-made flakes.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 163
页数:17
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] IDENTIFYING STONE TOOL CUT MARKS AND THE PRE-CLOVIS OCCUPATION OF THE PAISLEY CAVES
    Hockett, Bryan
    Jenkins, Dennis L.
    AMERICAN ANTIQUITY, 2013, 78 (04) : 762 - 778
  • [2] Contour Analysis of Stone and Steel Tool Cut Marks
    Creal, Ariel
    Schmidt, Christopher
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2024, 183 : 37 - 37
  • [3] CARNIVORE TOOTH MARKS AND STONE TOOL BUTCHERY MARKS ON SCAVENGED BONES - ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS
    SELVAGGIO, MM
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION, 1994, 27 (1-3) : 215 - 228
  • [4] Using 3D Microscopy to Analyze Experimental Cut Marks on Animal Bones Produced with Different Stone Tools
    Moretti, Erika
    Arrighi, Simona
    Boschin, Francesco
    Crezzini, Jacopo
    Aureli, Daniele
    Ronchitelli, Annamaria
    ETHNOBIOLOGY LETTERS, 2015, 6 (02): : 267 - 275
  • [5] IMPORTANCE OF ANIMAL BONES AS A SECONDARY RAW-MATERIAL
    ANDERS, HG
    ROLACK, E
    FROBOESS, J
    CHEMISCHE TECHNIK, 1981, 33 (10): : 538 - 538
  • [6] Flint and Quartzite: Distinguishing Raw Material Through Bone Cut Marks
    Mate-Gonzalez, M. A.
    Yravedra, J.
    Martin-Perea, D. M.
    Palomeque-Gonzalez, J.
    San-Juan-Blazquez, M.
    Estaca-Gomez, V.
    Uribelarrea, D.
    Alvarez-Alonso, D.
    Cuartero, F.
    Gonzalez-Aguilera, D.
    Dominguez-Rodrigo, M.
    ARCHAEOMETRY, 2018, 60 (03) : 437 - 452
  • [7] Experimentation of cut marks on bones: Reconstructing the force applied and type of weapon
    Humphrey, Caitlin L.
    Henneberg, Maciej
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2015, 156 : 173 - 173
  • [8] The influence of cut material on the slicing efficiency effects of stone tool flake size, edge length, and gross edge curvature
    Khaksar, Somaye
    Desai, Nisarg
    Eren, Metin I.
    Tostevin, Gilbert B.
    JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE-REPORTS, 2023, 47
  • [9] Animal bones with intentional cut marks from the Middle Pleistocene site of Bilzingsleben, Germany
    Steguweit, L
    Mania, D
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION, 2000, 38 (03) : A29 - A29