Improved confidence regions in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

被引:1
|
作者
Ito, Tsubasa [2 ]
Sugasawa, Shonosuke [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Ctr Spatial Informat Sci, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 2778568, Japan
[2] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, M&D Data Sci Ctr, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Asymptotic expansion; Bias correction; Confidence region; Random-effects model; MULTIVARIATE METAANALYSIS; INFERENCE; MODEL; MOMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.csda.2020.107068
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies have been gathering attention in research in clinical epidemiology and health technology development, and bivariate random-effects model is becoming a standard tool. However, standard inference methods usually underestimate statistical errors and possibly provide highly overconfident results under realistic situations since they ignore the variability in the estimation of variance parameters. To overcome the difficulty, a new improved inference method, namely, an accurate confidence region for the meta-analysis of DTA, by asymptotically expanding the coverage probability of the standard confidence region. The advantage of the proposed confidence region is that it holds a relatively simple expression and does not require any repeated calculations such as Bootstrap or Monte Carlo methods to compute the region, thereby the proposed method can be easily carried out in practical applications. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated through simulation studies and an application to meta-analysis of screening test accuracy for alcohol problems. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Meta-analysis for the diagnostic accuracy of a test?
    McDonough, PG
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 71 (02) : 391 - 392
  • [2] Meta-analysis for the diagnostic accuracy of a test? Reply
    Nieschlag, E
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1999, 71 (02) : 390 - 391
  • [3] Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy: Just another meta-analysis?
    Lathyris, Dimitrios
    Haidich, Anna-Bettina
    [J]. INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2021, 64
  • [4] Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy in neurosurgical practice
    Dubourg, Julie
    Berhouma, Moncef
    Cotton, Michael
    Messerer, Mahmoud
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2012, 33 (01)
  • [5] Diagnostic test accuracy: methods for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Campbell, Jared M.
    Klugar, Miloslav
    Ding, Sandrine
    Carmody, Dennis P.
    Hakonsen, Sasja J.
    Jadotte, Yuri T.
    White, Sarahlouise
    Munn, Zachary
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2015, 13 (03) : 154 - 162
  • [6] Diagnostic Accuracy of BRAF Immunohistochemistry in Colorectal Cancer: a Meta-Analysis and Diagnostic Test Accuracy Review
    Pyo, Jung-Soo
    Sohn, Jin Hee
    Kang, Guhyun
    [J]. PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2016, 22 (04) : 831 - 837
  • [8] Modelling multiple thresholds in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
    Susanne Steinhauser
    Martin Schumacher
    Gerta Rücker
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 16
  • [9] Meta-analysis of diagnostic and screening test accuracy evaluations: Methodologic primer
    Gatsonis, Constantine
    Paliwal, Prashni
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 187 (02) : 271 - 281
  • [10] On composite likelihood in bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
    Aristidis K. Nikoloulopoulos
    [J]. AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, 2018, 102 : 211 - 227