An analysis of chemotherapy dose and dose-intensity in small-cell lung cancer: lessons to be drawn

被引:29
|
作者
Tjan-Heijnen, VCG
Wagener, DJT
Postmus, PE
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Nijmegen, Dept Med Oncol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Pulmonol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
chemotherapy; dose; dose intensity; review; small-cell lung cancer;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdf249
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The survival in untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is <3 months. Prognosis has improved with chemotherapy, but remains poor. One of the issues concerning current chemotherapy is whether there is any benefit of increasing chemotherapy dose or dose intensity (DI). Design: In the present review, 20 randomised studies, published in the period 1980-2001, in which dose or DI of chemotherapy in SCLC were the only variables tested, are analysed. The studies were categorised as follows: (i) number of cycles (treatment duration); (ii) dose per cycle; (iii) interval between cycles (dose densification); and (iv) a combination of these variables. Results: (i) With treatment duration reduced to three to six cycles, median survival time (MST) was 2 months shorter, most evident in patients showing a (complete) response to initial chemotherapy. (ii) An improved survival was observed in two out of five high-dose studies. (iii) Survival was increased by 0.6 to 6.2 months in all four densification studies. (iv) Survival was not improved in studies that used dose-escalation and/or -densification in combination with a reduced number of cycles. The sample sizes were too small to be conclusive in most of the individual trials. The median of the MSTs in the 20 trials taken together was 9.8 months for the standard arms and 11.5 months for the intensified arms (i.e. more cycles, higher dose per cycle and/or shorter intervals). After omitting the two trials with reduced number of cycles in the so-called 'high-dose' arm, the median of MSTs was 8.7 and 11.5 months, respectively. There was only a slight improvement (1%) in 2-year survival for all trials taken together. However, when only taking high-dose and dose-densified chemotherapy trials into account, the difference in median 2-year survival became 19% (12% versus 31%). Conclusions: The above classification facilitates our understanding about doses of chemotherapy and it makes us appreciate the relevance of the individual determinants. It appears that the number of cycles, dose level, dose density, cumulative dose and DI are all important factors for improving survival. Intensification of chemotherapy still deserves further research in SCLC.
引用
收藏
页码:1519 / 1530
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DOSE-INTENSITY METAANALYSIS OF CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS IN SMALL-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE LUNG
    KLASA, RJ
    MURRAY, N
    COLDMAN, AJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (03) : 499 - 508
  • [2] Increased dose-intensity in small-cell lung cancer: A failed strategy?
    Johnson, DH
    Carbone, DP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (08) : 2297 - 2299
  • [3] CHEMOTHERAPY DOSE INTENSITY IN SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER
    SOUHAMI, RL
    DEELVIRA, MCR
    [J]. LUNG CANCER, 1994, 10 : S175 - S185
  • [4] Dose intensity of chemotherapy in small-cell lung carcinoma
    Borg, C
    Ligneau, B
    Trillet-Lenoir, V
    [J]. BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2001, 88 (09) : 863 - 870
  • [5] Importance of dose and dose intensity in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer
    Murray, N
    [J]. CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 40 (Suppl 1) : S58 - S63
  • [6] Importance of dose and dose intensity in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer
    Nevin Murray
    [J]. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 1997, 40 : S58 - S63
  • [7] Increasing chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer: From dose intensity and density to megadoses
    Crivellari, Gino
    Monfardini, Silvio
    Stragliotto, Silvia
    Marino, Dario
    Aversa, Savina Maria Luciana
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2007, 12 (01): : 79 - 89
  • [8] CHEMOTHERAPY IN SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - FROM VIEW POINT OF DOSE INTENSITY
    NAKAI, Y
    KOINUMARU, S
    SUZUKI, S
    SAITO, J
    SUGAWARA, S
    NUMATA, Y
    SATO, J
    MATSUBARA, N
    MOTOMIYA, M
    [J]. TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 1992, 168 (02): : 427 - 430
  • [9] High-dose chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer
    Pasini, F
    Durante, E
    De Manzoni, D
    Rosti, G
    Pelosi, G
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2002, 22 (6B) : 3465 - 3472
  • [10] RECEIVED DOSE-INTENSITY - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF WEEKLY CHEMOTHERAPY WITH AND WITHOUT GRANULOCYTE-COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR IN SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER
    MILES, DW
    FOGARTY, O
    ASH, CM
    RUDD, RM
    TRASK, CWL
    SPIRO, SG
    GREGORY, WM
    LEDERMANN, JA
    SOUHAMI, RL
    HARPER, PG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (01) : 77 - 82