Public Views on Models for Accessing Genomic and Health Data for Research: Mixed Methods Study

被引:7
|
作者
Jones, Kerina H. [1 ]
Daniels, Helen [1 ]
Squires, Emma [1 ]
Ford, David V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swansea Univ, Swansea Univ Med Sch, Populat Data Sci, Singleton Pk, Swansea SA28PP, W Glam, Wales
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
human genome; genetic databases; public opinion; data storage; data linkage;
D O I
10.2196/14384
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The literature abounds with increasing numbers of research studies using genomic data in combination with health data (eg, health records and phenotypic and lifestyle data), with great potential for large-scale research and precision medicine. However, concerns have been raised about social acceptability and risks posed for individuals and their kin. Although there has been public engagement on various aspects of this topic, there is a lack of information about public views on data access models. Objective: This study aimed to address the lack of information on the social acceptability of access models for reusing genomic data collected for research in conjunction with health data. Models considered were open web-based access, released externally to researchers, and access within a data safe haven. Methods: Views were ascertained using a series of 8 public workshops (N=116). The workshops included an explanation of benefits and risks in using genomic data with health data, a facilitated discussion, and an exit questionnaire. The resulting quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, and the qualitative data were analyzed for emerging themes. Results: Respondents placed a high value on the reuse of genomic data but raised concerns including data misuse, information governance, and discrimination. They showed a preference for giving consent and use of data within a safe haven over external release or open access. Perceived risks with open access included data being used by unscrupulous parties, with external release included data security, and with safe havens included the need for robust safeguards. Conclusions: This is the first known study exploring public views of access models for reusing anonymized genomic and health data in research. It indicated that people are generally amenable but prefer data safe havens because of perceived sensitivities. We recommend that public views be incorporated into guidance on models for the reuse of genomic and health data.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Barriers to accessing public cancer genomic data
    Katrina Learned
    Ann Durbin
    Robert Currie
    Ellen Towle Kephart
    Holly C. Beale
    Lauren M. Sanders
    Jacob Pfeil
    Theodore C. Goldstein
    Sofie R. Salama
    David Haussler
    Olena Morozova Vaske
    Isabel M. Bjork
    [J]. Scientific Data, 6
  • [2] Barriers to accessing public cancer genomic data
    Learned, Katrina
    Durbin, Ann
    Currie, Robert
    Kephart, Ellen Towle
    Beale, Holly C.
    Sanders, Lauren M.
    Pfeil, Jacob
    Goldstein, Theodore C.
    Salama, Sofie R.
    Haussler, David
    Vaske, Olena Morozova
    Bjork, Isabel M.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2019, 6 (1)
  • [3] Public views on the donation and use of human biological samples in biomedical research: a mixed methods study
    Lewis, Celine
    Clotworthy, Margaret
    Hilton, Shona
    Magee, Caroline
    Robertson, Mark J.
    Stubbins, Lesley J.
    Corfield, Julie
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (08):
  • [4] Mixed methods research in public health: issues and illustration
    Guevel, Marie-Renee
    Pommier, Jeanine
    [J]. SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2012, 24 (01): : 23 - 38
  • [5] Public confidence in ADR identification and their views on ADRreporting: mixed methods study
    Jarernsiripornkul, Narumol
    Patsuree, Arunrot
    Krska, Janet
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 73 (02) : 223 - 231
  • [6] Public confidence in ADR identification and their views on ADRreporting: mixed methods study
    Narumol Jarernsiripornkul
    Arunrot Patsuree
    Janet Krska
    [J]. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2017, 73 : 223 - 231
  • [7] Improving Aging and Public Health Research: Qualitative and Mixed Methods
    Finn, Vincent
    Ellis, Rona
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH, 2009, 3 (04) : 414 - 415
  • [8] Exploring the views of planners and public health practitioners on integrating health evidence into spatial planning in England: a mixed-methods study
    Ige-Elegbede, Janet
    Pilkington, Paul
    Bird, Emma L.
    Gray, Selena
    Mindell, Jennifer S.
    Chang, Michael
    Stimpson, Aimee
    Gallagher, Dominic
    Petrokofsky, Carl
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 43 (03) : 664 - 672
  • [9] Sociodemographic data collection for health equity measurement: a mixed methods study examining public opinions
    Maritt Kirst
    Ketan Shankardass
    Sivan Bomze
    Aisha Lofters
    Carlos Quiñonez
    [J]. International Journal for Equity in Health, 12
  • [10] Sociodemographic data collection for health equity measurement: a mixed methods study examining public opinions
    Kirst, Maritt
    Shankardass, Ketan
    Bomze, Sivan
    Lofters, Aisha
    Quinonez, Carlos
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2013, 12