Optimization of environmental benefits of carbon mineralization technologies for biogas upgrading

被引:20
|
作者
Starr, Katherine [1 ]
Peiro, Laura Talens [2 ]
Lombardi, Lidia [3 ]
Gabarrell, Xavier [4 ]
Villalba, Gara [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Chem Engn, Sostenipra, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
[2] INSEAD, F-77305 Fontainebleau, France
[3] Univ Florence, Dept Ind Engn, Florence, Italy
[4] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Xarxa Referencia Biotechnol XRB Catalunya, Dept Chem Engn, Sostenipra,ICTA, Bellaterra, Spain
关键词
Biogas; Carbon capture; Carbon mineralization; Life cycle assessment; Cleaner production; RESIDUES; STORAGE; PLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.039
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Carbon mineralization is a promising process for carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and storage, and it can also be applied for biogas upgrading. This paper uses a life cycle assessment to identify possible methods of improving and reducing the environmental impact of novel biogas upgrading technologies. The two novel pilot-scale technologies that are assessed are alkaline absorption with regeneration (AwR) process and bottom ash for biogas upgrading (BABIU) process. These technologies are still at the pilot-plant scale, which offers the opportunity to identify how their environmental impact can be reduced before industrial-scale production occurs. The AwR technology uses an alkaline solution of either potassium hydroxide or sodium hydroxide to capture the CO2 and air pollution control residues to regenerate the solution. The BABIU process uses bottom ash (BA) from municipal solid waste incinerators to capture CO2 in a direct gas/solid contact process. For the AwR process, focus was placed on the reuse of wastewater (air pollution control residues require pre- and post-washing steps) and reagent type and concentration. Further improvements have focused on reagent and electricity use in AwR and the transport of BA for BABIU. The lowest environmental impact for AwR resulted when NaOH and in-process wastewater was reused. Even in such a process setting, AwR still has a higher environmental impact in 11 of 12 categories compared to other conventional biogas upgrading processes. On average, the BABIU process has a 73% lower impact than AwR and is comparable to conventional technologies. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 41
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biogas upgrading technologies: Energetic analysis and environmental impact assessment
    Xu, Yajing
    Huang, Ying
    Wu, Bin
    Zhang, Xiangping
    Zhang, Suojiang
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 23 (01) : 247 - 254
  • [2] Techno-economic and environmental assessment of the main biogas upgrading technologies
    Lombardi, Lidia
    Francini, Giovanni
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 156 : 440 - 458
  • [3] Technologies for Biogas Upgrading to Biomethane: A Review
    Adnan, Amir Izzuddin
    Ong, Mei Yin
    Nomanbhay, Saifuddin
    Chew, Kit Wayne
    Show, Pau Loke
    [J]. BIOENGINEERING-BASEL, 2019, 6 (04):
  • [4] Life cycle assessment of biogas upgrading technologies
    Starr, Katherine
    Gabarrell, Xavier
    Villalba, Gara
    Talens, Laura
    Lombardi, Lidia
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 32 (05) : 991 - 999
  • [5] A Review of Biogas Utilisation, Purification and Upgrading Technologies
    Awe, Olumide Wesley
    Zhao, Yaqian
    Nzihou, Ange
    Minh, Doan Pham
    Lyczko, Nathalie
    [J]. WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2017, 8 (02) : 267 - 283
  • [6] A Review of Biogas Utilisation, Purification and Upgrading Technologies
    Olumide Wesley Awe
    Yaqian Zhao
    Ange Nzihou
    Doan Pham Minh
    Nathalie Lyczko
    [J]. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2017, 8 : 267 - 283
  • [7] Membrane gas separation technologies for biogas upgrading
    Chen, Xiao Yuan
    Hoang Vinh-Thang
    Ramirez, Antonio Avalos
    Rodrigue, Denis
    Kaliaguine, Serge
    [J]. RSC ADVANCES, 2015, 5 (31) : 24399 - 24448
  • [8] Biogas Production Systems and Upgrading Technologies: A Review
    Andlar, Martina
    Belskaya, Halina
    Morzak, Galina
    Santek, Mirela Ivancic
    Rezic, Tonci
    Tominac, Vlatka Petravic
    Santek, Bozidar
    [J]. FOOD TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 59 (04) : 387 - 412
  • [9] Current Status of Biological Biogas Upgrading Technologies
    Lorant, Balint
    Tardy, Gabor Mark
    [J]. PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 66 (03) : 465 - 481
  • [10] Biogas Quality Upgrading by Carbon Mineralization with Calcium Hydroxide Solution in Continuous Bubble Column Reactor
    Madhania, Suci
    Kusdianto, K.
    Machmudah, Siti
    Nurtono, Tantular
    Widiyastuti, W.
    Winardi, Sugeng
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHEMICAL PROCESS AND PRODUCT ENGINEERING (ICCPPE) 2019, 2020, 2197