Triple-negative breast cancer: An institutional analysis

被引:26
|
作者
Gogia, A. [1 ]
Raina, V [1 ]
Deo, S. V. S. [2 ]
Shukla, N. K. [2 ]
Mohanti, B. K. [3 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci, Dr BRA Inst Rotary Canc Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, New Delhi, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Dr BRA Inst Rotary Canc Hosp, Dept Surg Oncol, New Delhi, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Dr BRA Inst Rotary Canc Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, New Delhi, India
关键词
Institutional study; triple-negative breast cancer; treatment outcome; PROGESTERONE-RECEPTOR; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; RECURRENCE; PHENOTYPE; PATTERNS; FEATURES; SUBTYPES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.4103/0019-509X.138275
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
AIM: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is defined by the lack of expression of the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER 2)/neu. It has been identified as an independent poor prognostic factor for survival. The aim of this study was to compare the clinico-pathological characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with TNBC and non-TNBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out an analysis of 706 patients with invasive breast cancer between January 2007 and December 2011 in whom information on the status of ER, PR, and HER2/neu were available. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-five patients (21.9%) patients had TNBC. Patients with TNBC had a significantly lower median age [46.2 vs. 49.8 years; P = 0.005, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98 to 2.38] and a higher proportion of high-grade tumors as compared to the non-TNBC group (43 vs. 24%; P < 0.0001). After a median follow-up of 30 months, the three-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was significantly lower in the TNBC group (76 vs. 64%; log rank P = 0.002). Three-year overall survival (OS) was lower in the TNBC group but not statistically significant. Age < 49 years, higher nodal stage, and larger tumor size (>5 cm) were associated with poor outcome. CONCLUSION: TNBC is significantly associated with younger age and high-grade tumors and constitutes 21.9% of all breast cancers in our institute. Triple negativity was a significantly poor prognostic factor for RFS but not OS.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 166
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Winkeljohn, Debra L.
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2008, 12 (06) : 861 - 863
  • [2] Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Hudis, Clifford A.
    [J]. CANCER JOURNAL, 2010, 16 (01): : 10 - 11
  • [3] Triple-negative breast cancer
    Chacon, Reinaldo D.
    Costanzo, Maria V.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 12
  • [4] Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Quyen D. Chu
    King, Tari
    Hurd, Thelma
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2012, 2012
  • [5] Triple-negative breast cancer
    Stockmans, Gert
    Deraedt, Karen
    Wildiers, Hans
    Moerman, Philippe
    Paridaens, Robert
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2008, 20 (06) : 614 - 620
  • [6] Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Foulkes, William D.
    Smith, Ian E.
    Reis-Filho, Jorge S.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 363 (20): : 1938 - 1948
  • [7] Triple-negative breast cancer
    Bartsch R.
    Ziebermayr R.
    Zielinski C.C.
    Steger G.G.
    [J]. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, 2010, 160 (7-8) : 174 - 181
  • [8] The Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Database: an omics platform for reference, integration and analysis of triple-negative breast cancer data
    Rajesh Raju
    Aswathy Mary Paul
    Vivekanand Asokachandran
    Bijesh George
    Lekshmi Radhamony
    Meena Vinaykumar
    Reshmi Girijadevi
    Madhavan Radhakrishna Pillai
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 16
  • [9] Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Liedtke, Cornelia
    Schmutzler, Rita
    Schneeweiss, Andreas
    Loibl, Sybille
    Thill, Marc
    Heitz, Florian
    [J]. BREAST CARE, 2010, 5 (05) : 359 - 363
  • [10] Triple-negative breast cancer
    Aschenbrenner, Diane S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2020, 120 (08) : 22 - 23