Influence of bone-anchored maxillary protraction on secondary alveolar bone graft status in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate

被引:4
|
作者
Gomes, Oscar Stangherlin [1 ]
Carvalho, Roberta Martinelli [2 ]
Faco, Renato [2 ]
Yatabe, Marilia [3 ]
Ozawa, Terumi Okada [1 ]
De Clerck, Hugo [4 ]
Timmerman, Hilde
Garib, Daniela [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Orthodont, Hosp Rehabil Craniofacial Anomalies, Rua Silvio March 3-20, BR-17012900 Bauru, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Rehabil Craniofacial Anomalies, Dept Maxillofacial Surg, Bauru, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont & Pediat Dent, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Orthodont, Sch Dent, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[5] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Orthodont, Bauru Sch Dent, Bauru, SP, Brazil
[6] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Rehabil Craniofacial Anomalies, Bauru, SP, Brazil
关键词
BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN-2; RESIDUAL ALVEOLAR; RECONSTRUCTION; OUTCOMES; CHILDREN; THERAPY; MATRIX;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.10.021
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction: Our objective was to evaluate the effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) on the status of the secondary alveolar bone graft in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Methods: The experimental group (EG) comprised 26 patients with UCLP, mean age of 11.9 years, submitted to secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) with recombinant bone morphogenetic protein, and BAMP therapy, using miniplate-borne Class III intermaxillary elastics. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations were taken 6 months after SABG and before BAMP (T1) and after 18 months of BAMP therapy (T2). The control group (CG) was composed of 24 patients with UCLP submitted only to SABG with recombinant bone morphogenetic protein or autogenous bone from iliac crest without BAMP therapy, matched by initial age and sex with the EG. In the CG, CBCT examinations were performed 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2) after SABG surgery. CBCT axial sections were analyzed using Garib scores in both time points. Intra- and intergroup comparisons were performed using Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests, respectively (P < 0.05). Results: No intergroup differences were found at T1 and T2. The EG showed significant improvement of graft status from T1 to T2 at the cervical and middle levels of the alveolar cleft. No significant interphase differences were found for graft scores in the CG. Conclusions: Despite loads of intermaxillary elastics applied to the maxilla, no harm to the grafted alveolar bone was observed after BAMP therapy in patients with UCLP.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 737
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a cephalometric appraisal
    Faco, Renato
    Yatabe, Marilia
    Cevidanes, Lucia H. S.
    Timmerman, Hilde
    De Clerck, Hugo J.
    Garib, Daniela
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2019, 41 (05) : 537 - 543
  • [2] Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate
    Raghavan, Sreevatsan
    Sharma, Karan
    Batra, Puneet
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2021, 159 (03) : E191 - E191
  • [3] Impact of bone-anchored maxillary protraction on the quality of life of subjects with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate
    Nascimento, Vanessa de Couto
    Martins, Mariana Martins e
    Vilella, Beatriz de Souza
    Faco, Renato
    Timmerman, Hilde
    De Clerck, Hugo
    Garib, Daniela
    Vilellaa, Oswaldo de Vasconcellos
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2023, 163 (01) : 102 - 109
  • [4] Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: Is maxillary expansion mandatory?
    Elabbassy, Eman H.
    Sabet, Noha E.
    Hassan, Islam T.
    Elghoul, Dina H.
    Elkassaby, Marwa A.
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2020, 90 (04) : 539 - 547
  • [5] Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate and Class III malocclusion
    Yijin Ren
    Ralph Steegman
    Arjan Dieters
    Johan Jansma
    Harry Stamatakis
    [J]. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2019, 23 : 2429 - 2441
  • [6] Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate and Class III malocclusion
    Ren, Yijin
    Steegman, Ralph
    Dieters, Arjan
    Jansma, Johan
    Stamatakis, Harry
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 23 (05) : 2429 - 2441
  • [7] Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in a patient with complete cleft lip and palate: A case report
    Garib, Daniela
    Yatabe, Marilia
    de Souza Faco, Renato Andre
    Gregorio, Leonardo
    Cevidanes, Lucia
    de Clerck, Hugo
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2018, 153 (02) : 290 - 297
  • [8] Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate Response
    Gomes, Oscar Stangherlin
    Carvalho, Roberta Martinelli
    Faco, Renato
    Yatabe, Marilia
    Ozawa, Terumi Okada
    De Clerck, Hugo
    Timmerman, Hilde
    Garib, Daniela
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2021, 159 (03) : E193 - E193
  • [9] Bone-anchored maxillary protraction therapy in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate: 3-dimensional assessment of maxillary effects
    Yatabe, Marilia
    Garib, Daniela Gamba
    de Souza Faco, Renato Andre
    de Clerck, Hugo
    Janson, Guilherme
    Tung Nguyen
    Cevidanes, Lucia Helena Soares
    Ruellas, Antonio Carlos
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 152 (03) : 327 - 335
  • [10] Three-dimensional volumetric changes in the airway of growing unilateral complete cleft lip and palate patients after bone-anchored maxillary protraction
    Steegman, Ralph
    Schoeman, Adriaan
    Dieters, Arjan
    Jongsma, Bert
    Jansma, Johan
    van der Meer, Joerd
    Ren, Yijin
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2022, 162 (06) : 850 - 860