Should Antihypertensive Treatment Recommendations Differ in Patients With and Without Coronary Heart Disease? (from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial [ALLHAT])

被引:7
|
作者
Alderman, Michael H. [1 ]
Davis, Barry R. [2 ]
Piller, Linda B. [2 ]
Ford, Charles E. [2 ]
Baraniuk, M. Sarah [2 ]
Pressel, Sara L. [2 ]
Assadi, Mahshid A. [3 ]
Einhorn, Paula T. [4 ]
Haywood, L. Julian [5 ]
Ilamathi, Ekambaram [6 ]
Oparil, Suzanne [7 ]
Retta, Tamrat M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Med Gen Internal Med, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[2] Univ Texas Houston, Sch Publ Hlth, Coordinating Ctr Clin Trials, Houston, TX 77021 USA
[3] SUNY Hlth Sci Ctr, Brooklyn, NY USA
[4] NHLBI, Div Prevent & Populat Sci, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, LAC USC Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[6] Suffolk Nephrol Consultants, Stony Brook, NY USA
[7] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Med & Physiol & Biophys, Birmingham, AL USA
[8] Howard Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med, Washington, DC USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2016年 / 117卷 / 01期
关键词
CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; HYPERTENSION; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; FAILURE; INTERVENTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Thiazide-type diuretics have been recommended for initial treatment of hypertension in most patients, but should this recommendation differ for patients with and without coronary heart disease (CHD)? The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) was a randomized, -double-blind hypertension treatment trial in 42,418 participants with high risk of combined cardiovascular disease (CVD) (25% with preexisting CHD). This post hoc analysis compares long-term major clinical outcomes in those assigned amlodipine (n = 9048) or lisinopril (n = 9,054) with those assigned chlorthalidone (n = 15,255), stratified by CHD status. After 4 to 8 years, randomized treatment was discontinued. Total follow-up (active treatment + passive surveillance using national databases for deaths and hospitalizations) was 8 to 13 years. For most CVD outcomes, endstage renal disease, and total mortality, there were no differences across randomized treatment arms regardless of baseline CHD status. In-trial rates of CVD were significantly higher for lisinopril compared with chlorthalidone, and rates of heart failure were significantly higher for arnlodipine compared with chlorthalidone in those with and without CHD (overall hazard ratios [HRs] 1.10, p < 0.001, and 1.38, p < 0.001, respectively). During extended followup, significant outcomes according to GM status interactions (p = 0.012) were noted in amlodipine versus chlorthalidone comparison for CVD and CHD mortality (HR 0.88, p = 0.04, and 0.84, p = 0.04, respectively) in those with CHD at baseline (HR 1.06, p = 0.15, and 1.08, p = 0.17) and in those without. The results of the overall increased stroke mortality in lisinopril compared with chlorthalidone (HR 1.2; p = 0.03) and hospitalized heart failure in amlodipine compared with chlorthalidone (HR 1.12; p = 0.01) during extended follow-up did not differ by baseline CHD status. In conclusion, these results provide no reason to alter our previous recommendation to include a properly dosed diuretic (such as chlorthalidone 12.5 to 25 mg/day) in the initial antihypertensive regimen for most hypertensive patients. (c) 2016 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 115
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Angioedema in the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT)
    Piller, L
    Ford, C
    Davis, B
    Nwachuku, C
    Black, H
    Oparil, S
    Gappy, S
    Retta, T
    Probstfield, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2005, 18 (05) : 92A - 92A
  • [2] Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) - Practical implications
    Oparil, S
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2003, 41 (05) : 1006 - 1009
  • [3] Antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack (ALLHAT) trial: Interim results
    Davis, B
    Furberg, CD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 36 (01) : 325 - 325
  • [4] Participant recruitment in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)
    Pressel, S
    Davis, BR
    Louis, GT
    Whelton, P
    Adrogue, H
    Egan, D
    Farber, M
    Payne, G
    Probstfield, J
    Ward, H
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2001, 22 (06): : 674 - 686
  • [5] The antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial
    Flack, JM
    Nasser, SA
    [J]. CURRENT HYPERTENSION REPORTS, 2003, 5 (03) : 189 - 191
  • [6] Effect of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) on Conduction System Disease
    Dewland, Thomas A.
    Soliman, Elsayed Z.
    Davis, Barry R.
    Magnani, Jared W.
    Yamal, Jose-Miguel
    Piller, Linda B.
    Haywood, L. Julian
    Alonso, Alvaro
    Albert, Christine M.
    Marcus, Gregory M.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 176 (08) : 1085 - 1092
  • [7] Heterogeneity in Early Responses in ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial)
    Dhruva, Sanket S.
    Huang, Chenxi
    Spatz, Erica S.
    Coppi, Andreas C.
    Warner, Frederick
    Li, Shu-Xia
    Lin, Haiqun
    Xu, Xiao
    Furberg, Curt D.
    Davis, Barry R.
    Pressel, Sara L.
    Coifman, Ronald R.
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2017, 70 (01) : 94 - 102
  • [8] Blood pressure control in the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT)
    Cushman, WC
    Ford, CE
    Cutler, JA
    Margolis, KL
    Davis, BR
    Grimm, RH
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2002, 106 (19) : 476 - 476
  • [10] Baseline characteristics of the diabetic participants in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT)
    Barzilay, JI
    Jones, CL
    Davis, BR
    Basile, JN
    Goff, DC
    Ciocon, JO
    Sweeney, ME
    Randall, OS
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2001, 24 (04) : 654 - 658