Youth and Adult Arrests for Cannabis Possession After Decriminalization and Legalization of Cannabis

被引:54
|
作者
Plunk, Andrew D. [1 ]
Peglow, Stephanie L. [2 ]
Harrell, Paul T. [1 ]
Grucza, Richard A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Dept Pediat, 855 Brambleton Ave,EV Williams Hall, Norfolk, VA 23510 USA
[2] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Dept Psychiat, Norfolk, VA 23501 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med St Louis, Dept Psychiat, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
MEDICAL MARIJUANA LAWS; HEALTH; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.1539
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Key PointsQuestionDo arrests of youths for possession of cannabis change when cannabis policy focuses on adults? FindingsThis quasi-experimental study suggests that arrest rates of youths significantly decreased in states that decriminalized cannabis possession for everyone but did not decrease in states that legalized adult use. MeaningIt appears to be important to consider what happens to youths when cannabis policy treats adults and youths differently. ImportanceCivil liberty advocates typically support legalization of cannabis, which targets adult use, rather than decriminalization, which can affect both adults and youths. However, it is unknown how arrests of youths for cannabis possession change when adult use of cannabis is legalized. ObjectiveTo model changes in arrest rates of adults and youths after decriminalization and legalization of cannabis. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis quasi-experimental study used the publicly available Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data: Arrests by Age, Sex, and Race administrative data set to examine arrest rates in 38 states from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2016. Adult (age, >= 18 years) and youth (age, <18 years) arrests for possession of cannabis were examined. States were excluded if they did not report complete arrest data or if a policy was implemented that reduced penalties for possession of cannabis but fell short of decriminalization. Fixed-effects regression was used in an extended difference-in-differences framework. The analyses in their final form were conducted between January 17 and February 28, 2019. ExposureLiving in a state with a cannabis decriminalization policy (ie, making the penalty for cannabis possession similar to the small fine for a traffic violation) or legalization policy (ie, creating a legal supply of cannabis along with the removal of penalties for possession of a small amount of cannabis for recreational use). Main Outcome and MeasuresState cannabis possession arrest rate per 100000 population. ResultsData from 38 states were examined, including 4 states with cannabis legalization policies and 7 states with cannabis decriminalization policies. The adult arrest rate decreased by 131.28 (95% CI, 106.23-154.21) per 100000 population after the implementation of decriminalization and 168.50 (95% CI, 158.64-229.65) per 100000 population after the implementation of legalization. The arrest rate for youths decreased by 60 (95% CI, 42-75) per 100000 population after decriminalization but did not significantly change after legalization in a state (7 per 100000 population; 95% CI, -15 to 30). Conclusions and RelevanceLegalization, as implemented through 2016, did not appear to reduce arrests for cannabis possession among youths, despite having benefited adults. The study's findings suggest that decriminalization reduces youth arrests in most cases, but these findings also suggest that any benefit for youths could be lost when adult use has also been legalized. To address this problem, it appears that state decriminalization policies should take the additional step to explicitly describe when youths can be arrested for possession of small amounts of cannabis.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 769
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cannabis decriminalization and racial disparity in arrests for cannabis possession
    Gunadi, Christian
    Shi, Yuyan
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2022, 293
  • [2] Association of Racial Disparity of Cannabis Possession Arrests Among Adults and Youths With Statewide Cannabis Decriminalization and Legalization
    Sheehan, Brynn E.
    Grucza, Richard A.
    Plunk, Andrew D.
    [J]. JAMA HEALTH FORUM, 2021, 2 (10): : E213435
  • [3] Assessing the Impact of Cannabis Decriminalization on Racial Disparities in Chicago's Cannabis Possession Arrests
    Owusu-Bempah, Akwasi
    Wallace, Danielle
    Gaston, Shytierra
    Eason, John
    Sevell, Eric
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY OF RACE AND ETHNICITY, 2024, 10 (02) : 211 - 227
  • [4] Cannabis: Legalization vs Decriminalization
    Hicks, Adrienne
    Rubin, Eric
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL ON ADDICTIONS, 2021, 30 (03): : 252 - 252
  • [5] A tale of two cities: Racialized arrests following decriminalization and recreational legalization of cannabis
    Joshi, Spruha
    Doonan, Samantha M.
    Pamplin Ii, John R.
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2023, 249
  • [6] Current Status of Cannabis Legalization and Decriminalization Efforts in Nepal
    Pathak, Nabin
    Dhungana, Shreya
    Basyal, Bijaya
    Jha, Prabhat Kumar
    Shrestha, Sunil
    Thapa, Panna
    Paudyal, Vibhu
    [J]. SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 15 : 163 - 171
  • [7] Association of Recreational Cannabis Legalization With Cannabis Possession Arrest Rates in the US
    Gunadi, Christian
    Shi, Yuyan
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (12) : e2244922
  • [8] Association of Cannabis Legalization and Decriminalization With Arrest Rates of Youths
    Smart, Rosanna
    Kleiman, Mark A. R.
    [J]. JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2019, 173 (08) : 725 - 727
  • [9] Cannabis-related Hospitalizations Among Youth in Canada Before and After Cannabis Legalization
    Auger, Nathalie
    Luu, Thuy Mai
    Ayoub, Aimina
    Bilodeau-Bertrand, Marianne
    Lo, Ernest
    Low, Nancy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADDICTION MEDICINE, 2021, 15 (03) : 245 - 247
  • [10] The impact of cannabis legalization and decriminalization on acute poisoning: A systematic review
    Allaf, Sara
    Lim, Jessy S.
    Buckley, Nicholas A.
    Cairns, Rose
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2023, 118 (12) : 2252 - 2274