Boar taint in pigs selected for components of efficient lean growth rate

Genetic and nutritional effects on the boar taint traits of androstenone, skatole and indole and the eating quality traits associated with boar taint were examined by testing animals from four selection lines and a control line on isoenergetic diets, which differed in ileal digestible lysine: digestible energy (0.40, 0.76 and 1.12 g lysine/MJ DE). The selected lines resulted from seven generations of selection for high daily food intake, lean food conversion ratio (LFC) and lean growth rate on ad libitum (LGA) or restricted (LGS) feeding regimes in a Large White population. During performance test, from 30 to 90 kg, boars were fed on either ad libitum or restricted (0.75 g/g ad libitum daily food intake) feeding regimes. A sensory panel assessed heated fat samples for androstenone odour, skatole odour and abnormal odour. There were no significant differences between the selection and control lines or diets for log transformed fat content of androstenone, skatole, indole. The significant diet with feeding regime interaction for log transformed fat content of skatole and indole were essentially due to significantly higher log transformed fat contents with ad libitum feeding of the high lysine diet compared to restricted feeding (skatole: -1.94 vs -3.06, s.e.d. 0.43; indole: -3.44 vs -4.22, s.e.d. 0.28). as differences between feeding regimes on diets A and C were not significantly different from zero. There were no significant differences between selection and control fines for sensory panel score for abnormal odour or androstenone odour, but the LFC and LGA selection lines had a significantly higher skatole odour score than the LGS selection line. Neither diet nor feeding regime had any significant effect on sensory panel assessment of odour. Log transformed fat content of androstenone and skatole were significantly correlated with sensory panel score for skatole odour (0.37 and 0.46, s.e. 0.12), but not with sensory panel score for androstenone odour (0.06 and 0.09), such that they would not be useful predictors of androstenone odour. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.