Trade effects of geographical indication policy: The EU case

被引:38
|
作者
Raimondi, Valentina [1 ]
Falco, Chiara [1 ]
Curzi, Daniele [1 ]
Olper, Alessandro [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Milan, Italy
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, LICOS Ctr Inst & Econ Performance, Leuven, Belgium
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
EU geographical indications; export unit values; food quality; trade margins; PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION; QUALITY CERTIFICATION; PROTECTION; VARIETY; COMPETITION; INCENTIVES; STANDARDS; PRICES; IMPACT; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1111/1477-9552.12349
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Using a new detailed dataset on country-product information on European Union (EU) Geographical Indications (GIs), we study the impact of this food quality policy on trade margins over the 1996-2014 period. We consider the effect of GIs on both intra- and extra-EU trade margins (extensive and intensive), as well as on export (and import) unit values. Our main results show that GIs affect trade flows differently depending on whether GIs are produced by the exporter or importer country. The presence of GIs in the exporter country systematically exerts a positive trade effect on both the extensive and intensive trade margin. When registered only in the importer country, GIs seem to act weakly as a trade-reducing measure, at least at the intensive trade margin. In addition, GIs positively affect export prices, consistent with the idea that GI products are perceived by consumers as higher quality goods. Importantly, extra-EU trade margins react similarly to those on intra-EU trade. These results have clear and interesting implications concerning the EU strategy of promoting the protection of GIs worldwide.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 356
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Understanding EU Trade Policy on Geographical Indications
    Moir, Hazel V. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE, 2017, 51 (06) : 1021 - 1042
  • [2] The Effects of Institutional Measures: Geographical Indication in Mercosur and the EU
    Fracarolli, Guilherme Silva
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (06)
  • [3] The Effects of Trade Policy on Trade among the EU and BRICS Countries
    Vahalik, Bohdan
    Fojtikova, Lenka
    [J]. EKONOMICKY CASOPIS, 2020, 68 (09): : 918 - 938
  • [4] EU's Regulation of Geographical Indications and their Effects on Trade Flows
    Leufkens, Daniel
    [J]. GERMAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 66 (04): : 223 - 233
  • [5] Framing EU trade policy online: the case of @NoAlTTIP on Twitter
    Bouza, Luis
    Oleart, Alvaro
    Tunon, Jorge
    [J]. COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY-SPAIN, 2019, 32 (04): : 257 - 273
  • [6] EU and trade policy-making: the contentious case of CETA
    Hubner, Kurt
    Deman, Anne-Sophie
    Balik, Tugce
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION, 2017, 39 (07) : 843 - 857
  • [7] On the effects of EU trade policy: agricultural tariffs still matter
    Cipollina, Maria
    Salvatici, Luca
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 47 (04) : 1367 - 1401
  • [8] Geographical indication regulation and intra-trade in the European Union
    Sorgho, Zakaria
    Larue, Bruno
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 45 : 1 - 12
  • [9] Is the EU's Trade Policy Aligning with America's Trade Policy?
    Eliasson, Johan
    Costa, Oriol
    Garcia-Duran, Patricia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE, 2023, 57 (02) : 231 - 252
  • [10] The Pursuit of Non-Trade Policy Objectives in EU Trade Policy
    Borchert, Ingo
    Conconi, Paola
    Di Ubaldo, Mattia
    Herghelegiu, Cristina
    [J]. WORLD TRADE REVIEW, 2021, 20 (05) : 623 - 647