Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Primary Repair of Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears Are Maintained at Mid-term Follow-up

Purpose: To assess the mid-term clinical outcomes in patients with proximal avulsion anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears undergoing arthroscopic primary repair with suture anchors. Methods: The first 11 consecutive patients with proximal avulsion tears treated with arthroscopic primary repair were evaluated at mid-term (minimum 5-year) follow-up. Physical examination was performed; laxity examination consisting of the Lachman, pivot-shift, and anterior drawer tests was performed; and patients were asked to complete the Lysholm, modified Cincinnati, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaires. Results: Of the 11 patients, 10 were seen at a mean follow-up of 6.0 +/- 1.5 years (range, 4.8-9.2 years). One patient was lost to follow-up, in whom failure had already occurred at short-term follow-up. One additional patient underwent reoperation for a medial meniscus tear and also had a partial ACL tear; this patient was clinically stable at last follow-up. All patients had full range of motion. Nine patients had negative Lachman and negative pivot-shift examination findings (IKDC score of A), and 1 patient had a 1A Lachman result and 1thorn pivot-shift result (IKDC score of B). The mean Lysholm score was 96.0 +/- 4.5 (range, 88-100); modified Cincinnati score, 95.6 +/- 7.4 (range, 80-100); Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, 95.4 +/- 5.4 (range, 85-100); preinjury Tegner score, 7.2 +/- 1.2 (range, 5-9); postoperative Tegner score, 6.6 +/- 1.8 (range, 3-9); and IKDC subjective score, 92.3 +/- 11.3 (range, 64-100). Conclusions: The clinical outcomes of arthroscopic primary repair of proximal ACL tears with suture anchors are excellent and are maintained at mid-term follow-up in a carefully selected subset of patients with proximal tears and excellent tissue quality. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.