Barriers to Pediatric Osseointegrated Bone-Conduction Hearing Devices

被引:1
|
作者
Koenigs, Maria B. [1 ]
Behzadpour, Hengameh K. [1 ]
Harrington, Chloe B. [1 ]
Prado, Leslie [1 ]
Gorelik, Daniel [2 ]
Woolman, Karen [3 ]
Rana, Md Sohel [4 ]
Preciado, Diego A. [1 ]
Reilly, Brian K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Natl Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, 111 Michigan Ave NW, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[2] George Washington Univ, Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Washington, DC 20052 USA
[3] Childrens Natl Hosp, Dept Hearing & Speech, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[4] Childrens Natl Hosp, Dept Surg, Washington, DC 20010 USA
关键词
Hearing amplification; Microtia; anotia; Osseointegrated bone conduction devices; Pediatric hearing loss; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; CHILDREN; LANGUAGE; SPEECH; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000003534
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To identify social, demographic, and clinical barriers for implantation with Osseointegrated Bone Conduction Devices (OBCD) in pediatric candidates. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of 94 children who met standard OBCD implantation criteria. Setting: Tertiary stand-alone children's hospital. Materials and Methods: Retrospective chart review comparing demographic (age, race, state of residence, and insurance) and clinical (severity and etiology of hearing loss, medical comorbidities, and early intervention) factors impacting implantation. Members of the existing cohort were then contacted to obtain a better understanding of qualitative factors impacting surgical decision. Results: Of the identified 94 surgical candidates, 47 (50%) underwent OBCD implantation. State of residence significantly impacted implantation rates, with children from the District of Columbia and Virginia being less likely to receive an implant than those from Maryland. Private insurance, race, and ethnicity did not impact rate of implantation (OR 2.8 [95% CI 0.78-10]; 1.34 [95% CI 0.44-3.68]; and 1.0 [95% CI 0.42-2.43], respectively). Children with anotia or microtia and children younger than 10 years old were less likely to have an implant (OR 10.6 (95% CI 1.74-65). Thirty-nine children participated in the qualitative portion. Themes that emerged as reasons to forgo implantation included a child's young age, planned reconstruction for microtia or atresia, and overall device functionality and usage. Thirtyseven children (39%) of the cohort declined surgery and currently wear a nonsurgical bone conduction aid regularly. Conclusion: Despite known benefits of implantation, only one-half of children who were candidates underwent OBCD. Unlike cochlear implantation, where insurance status is a major risk factor for implantation delay and underperformance, for OBCD, implantation barriers appear to be more multifactorial and include medical, demographic, and social factors.
引用
收藏
页码:E590 / E596
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complications and parent satisfaction in pediatric osseointegrated bone-conduction hearing implants
    Chan, Kenny H.
    Gao, Dexiang
    Jensen, Emily L.
    Allen, Gregory C.
    Cass, Stephen P.
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2017, 127 (09): : 2165 - 2170
  • [2] HEARING BY BONE CONDUCTION AND THE USE OF BONE-CONDUCTION HEARING AIDS
    LITTLER, TS
    KNIGHT, JJ
    STRANGE, PH
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE-LONDON, 1952, 45 (11): : 783 - 790
  • [3] AN IMPLANTABLE BONE-CONDUCTION HEARING DEVICE
    JOHNSON, R
    MEIKLE, M
    VERNON, J
    SCHLEUNING, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 1988, 9 : 93 - 100
  • [4] Outcomes and device use in children with bone-conduction hearing devices in South Africa
    van Zyl, Cheri
    Rogers, Christine
    Kuschke, Silva
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2024, 71 (01)
  • [5] Bone-conduction Hearing Aids: A Scoping Review
    Manuelli, Marianna
    Migliorelli, Andrea
    Moretti, Claudio
    Borin, Michela
    Malagutti, Nicola
    Bianchini, Chiara
    Pelucchi, Stefano
    Stomeo, Francesco
    Ciorba, Andrea
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2024,
  • [6] FORCE THRESHOLD FOR HEARING BY DIRECT BONE-CONDUCTION
    CARLSSON, P
    HAKANSSON, B
    RINGDAHL, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1995, 97 (02): : 1124 - 1129
  • [7] A piezoelectric bone-conduction bending hearing actuator
    Adamson, R. B. A.
    Bance, M.
    Brown, J. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2010, 128 (04): : 2003 - 2008
  • [8] THE OSSEOINTEGRATED BONE CONDUCTION HEARING-AID
    HOLT, GR
    TJELLSTROM, A
    LIDEN, G
    PAREL, SM
    BRANEMARK, PI
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1985, : 63 - 63
  • [9] Ultrasonic hearing by bone-conduction and its applications
    Nakagawa, Seiji
    [J]. ACOUSTICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 41 (06) : 851 - 856
  • [10] The Merits of Bilateral Application of Bone-Conduction Devices in Children With Bilateral Conductive Hearing Loss
    den Besten, Chrisje A.
    Vogt, Katharina
    Bosman, Arjan J.
    Snik, Ad F. M.
    Hol, Myrthe K. S.
    Agterberg, Martijn J. H.
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2020, 41 (05): : 1327 - 1332