Advancing donor liver age and rapid fibrosis progression following transplantation for hepatitis C

被引:218
|
作者
Wali, M
Harrison, RF
Gow, PJ
Mutimer, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Liver & Hepatobiliary Unit, Birmingham B15 2TH, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Dept Med, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Dept Pathol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
D O I
10.1136/gut.51.2.248
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims: Cirrhosis with liver failure due to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the most common indication for liver transplantation (LT). Reinfection of the transplanted liver by HCV is inevitable, and aggressive hepatitis with accelerated progression to graft cirrhosis may be observed. Of concern, recent reports suggest that the outcome of LT for HCV may have deteriorated in recent years. Determinants of rate of progression to cirrhosis in the immunocompetent non-transplant patient are well defined, and the most powerful determinant is patient age at the time of infection. Following LT for HCV, recipient age does not affect outcome of HCV reinfection. However, the impact of donor age on graft fibrosis progression rate following LT has not been examined. Methods: We have examined post-transplant biopsies to assess histological activity, including fibrosis stage (scored 0-6 units, 6 representing established cirrhosis), and to calculate fibrosis progression rates in 101 post-transplant specimens from 56 HCV infected LT patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses examined the impact of parameters including recipient and donor age and sex on fibrosis progression rate, and on predicted time to cirrhosis. Results: For the cohort, median fibrosis progression rate was 0.78 units/year, and median interval from transplantation to development of cirrhosis was 7.7 years. In multivariate analysis, donor age (not recipient age) was a powerful determinant (p=0.02) of fibrosis progression rate. When the liver donor was younger than 40 years, median progression rate was 0.6 units/year and interval to cirrhosis was 10 ears. When the donor was aged 50 years or more, median progression rate was 2.7 units/year and interval to cirrhosis only 2.2 years. During the observation period there has been a significant increase in donor age (p=0.01) but date of transplantation per se is not a determinant of progression rate when included in multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Donor age has a major influence on graft outcome following transplantation for HCV. The changing organ donor profile will affect the long term results of LT for HCV. These observations have important implications for donor liver allocation.
引用
收藏
页码:248 / 252
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors associated with rapid progression of fibrosis following liver transplantation for hepatitis C
    Contreras, J
    Marcellint, P
    Trak-Smayra, V
    Paradise, V
    Francoz, C
    Vidaud, M
    Prakash, K
    Degott, C
    Belghiti, J
    Valla, D
    Durand, F
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2003, 38 : 38 - 38
  • [2] Donor age affects fibrosis progression and graft survival after liver transplantation for hepatitis C
    Machicao, VI
    Bonatti, H
    Krishna, M
    Aqel, BA
    Lukens, FJ
    Nguyen, JH
    Rosser, BG
    Satyanarayana, R
    Grewal, HP
    Hewitt, WR
    Harnois, DM
    Crook, JE
    Steers, JL
    Dickson, RC
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 77 (01) : 84 - 92
  • [3] Mild donor liver steatosis has no impact on hepatitis C virus fibrosis progression following liver transplantation
    Botha, Jean F.
    Thompson, Eric
    Gilroy, Richard
    Grant, Wendy J.
    Mukherjee, Sandeep
    Lyden, Elizabeth R.
    Fox, Ira J.
    Sudan, Debra L.
    Shaw, Byers W., Jr.
    Langnas, Alan N.
    LIVER INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 27 (06) : 758 - 763
  • [4] CD81 PREDICTS FIBROSIS PROGRESSION FOLLOWING TRANSPLANTATION FOR HEPATITIS C REGARDLESS OF DONOR AGE
    Schmitt, Timothy M.
    Northup, Patrick G.
    Rudy, Christine K.
    Cruise, Michael W.
    Iezzoni, Julia C.
    Pruett, Timothy L.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 14 (07) : S242 - S242
  • [5] The influence of donor age on fibrosis progression rate in recurrent hepatitis C post-liver transplantation
    Fiel, MI
    Gan, DD
    Suriawinata, A
    Hartono, M
    Thung, SN
    Schiano, TD
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 124 (04) : A731 - A731
  • [6] Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV), fibrosis progression following liver transplantation: Impact of donor steatosis
    Botha, JF
    Thompson, E
    Gilroy, R
    Grant, W
    Sudan, D
    Shaw, B
    Langnas, A
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 12 (05) : C114 - C114
  • [7] Fibrosis progression in patients with recurrent hepatitis C following living donor and cadaveric liver transplantation.
    Shiffman, ML
    Stravitz, RT
    Sterling, RK
    Luketic, VA
    Sanyal, AJ
    Contos, MJ
    Mills, AS
    Cotterell, A
    Maluf, D
    Posner, MP
    Fisher, RA
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (06) : C1 - C1
  • [8] The Difference in the Fibrosis Progression of Recurrent Hepatitis C After Live Donor Liver Transplantation Versus Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation Is Attributable to the Difference in Donor Age
    Selzner, Nazia
    Girgrah, Nigel
    Lilly, Les
    Guindi, Maha
    Selzner, Markus
    Therapondos, George
    Adeyi, Oyedele
    McGilvray, Ian
    Cattral, Mark
    Greig, Paul D.
    Grant, David
    Levy, Gary
    Renner, Eberhard L.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 14 (12) : 1778 - 1786
  • [9] Occult hepatitis B virus infection in liver transplantation recipients with recurrent hepatitis C: Relationship with donor age and fibrosis progression
    Toniutto, P
    Minisini, R
    Burlone, M
    Biletta, E
    Fabris, C
    De Feo, TM
    Avellini, C
    Marangoni, F
    Fumo, E
    Giordano, F
    Pirisi, M
    HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 42 (04) : 318A - 318A
  • [10] Association of Genetic Variants With Rapid Fibrosis: Progression After Liver Transplantation for Hepatitis C
    Layden, Jennifer E.
    Tayo, Bamidele O.
    Cotler, Scott J.
    Clark, Nina M.
    Baraoidan, Kristine
    Friedman, Scott L.
    Cooper, Richard S.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 97 (10) : 1072 - 1078