What research evidence exists about physical activity in parents? A systematic scoping review

被引:1
|
作者
Simpson, Rachel F. [1 ]
Hesketh, Kathryn R. [1 ,2 ]
Ellis, Kate [1 ]
van Sluijs, Esther M. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] MRC Epidemiol Unit, Cambridge, England
[2] UCL, UCL Great Ormond St Inst Child Hlth, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 04期
基金
英国惠康基金; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
public health; epidemiology; social medicine; HEALTH BEHAVIORS; INTERVENTIONS; METAANALYSIS; CHILDREN; FACILITATORS; EDUCATION; EFFICACY; OUTCOMES; FATHERS; COUPLES;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054429
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Despite the known benefits of physical activity (PA) to physical and mental health, many people fail to achieve recommended PA levels. Parents are less active than non-parent contemporaries and constitute a large potential intervention population. However, little is known about the breadth and scope of parental PA research. This scoping review therefore aimed to provide an overview of the current evidence base on parental PA. Methods Four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Scopus) were systematically searched to identify peer-reviewed articles focusing on parental PA from 2005 onwards, including interventional, observational or qualitative study designs. Title and abstract screening was followed by duplicate full-text screening. Data extracted for all articles (100% checked by a second reviewer) included study design, proportion of fathers and ages of children. For interventional/observational studies, PA assessment method and factors examined or targeted based on the socio-ecological model were extracted, and questions addressed in qualitative studies. Results Of 14 913 unique records retrieved, 213 articles were included; 27 articles reported on more than one study design; 173 articles reported on quantitative (81 cross-sectional, 26 longitudinal and 76 interventional) and 58 on qualitative data. Most articles originated from North America (62%), and 53% included only mothers, while 2% included only fathers. Articles most frequently represented parents of infants (56% of articles), toddlers (43%), preschoolers (50%) and primary-school aged children (49%). Most quantitative articles only reported self-reported PA (70%). Observational articles focused on individual correlates/determinants (88%). Likewise, most interventions (88% of articles) targeted individual factors. Most qualitative articles explored PA barriers and facilitators (57%). Conclusions A range of quantitative and qualitative research has been conducted on parental PA. This review highlights opportunities for evidence synthesis to inform intervention development (such as barriers and facilitators of parental PA) and identifies gaps in the literature, for example, around paternal PA. Review registration osf.io/qt9up.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE BASE SURROUNDING PARENTAL PHYSICAL ACTIVITY? A SYSTEMATIC SCOPING REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
    Simpson, Rachel
    Ellis, Kate
    Hesketh, Kathryn
    van Sluijs, Esther
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2021, 75 : A61 - A61
  • [2] Developing and Disseminating Physical Activity Messages Targeting Parents: A Systematic Scoping Review
    Larocca, Victoria
    Arbour-Nicitopoulos, Kelly P.
    Tomasone, Jennifer R.
    Latimer-Cheung, Amy E.
    Bassett-Gunter, Rebecca L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (13)
  • [3] Operationalization of intersectionality in physical activity and sport research: A systematic scoping review
    Lim, Heejun
    Jung, Eun
    Jodoin, Kaila
    Du, XiaoWei
    Airton, Lee
    Lee, Eun-Young
    [J]. SSM-POPULATION HEALTH, 2021, 14
  • [4] Physical activity and sedentary behaviour research in Thailand: a systematic scoping review
    Liangruenrom, Nucharapon
    Suttikasem, Kanyapat
    Craike, Melinda
    Bennie, Jason A.
    Biddle, Stuart J. H.
    Pedisic, Zeljko
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 18
  • [5] Physical activity and sedentary behaviour research in Thailand: a systematic scoping review
    Nucharapon Liangruenrom
    Kanyapat Suttikasem
    Melinda Craike
    Jason A. Bennie
    Stuart J. H. Biddle
    Zeljko Pedisic
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 18
  • [6] A Scoping Review of Mixed Methods Research About Physical Activity for Children With Disabilities
    Michaud, Mathieu
    Harvey, William J.
    Bloom, Gordon A.
    [J]. ADAPTED PHYSICAL ACTIVITY QUARTERLY, 2023, 40 (01) : 142 - 172
  • [7] What is the landscape of evidence about the safety of physical agents used in physical medicine and rehabilitation? A scoping review
    Bargeri, Silvia
    Pellicciari, Leonardo
    Gallo, Chiara
    Rossettini, Giacomo
    Castellini, Greta
    Gianola, Silvia
    AIFI Consortium
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [8] Research About Parents of Children with Cochlear Implants: A Scoping Review
    Kecman, Emily
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEAF STUDIES AND DEAF EDUCATION, 2022, 27 (03): : 214 - 233
  • [9] What Is Known About Bullying and Physical Education? A Scoping Review
    Wei, Mengyi
    Graber, Kim C.
    [J]. RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2022, 93 : A110 - A111
  • [10] A systematic scoping review of the research on peer motivational climate in youth sports and physical activity
    Chung, KeonYoung
    de Andrade, Marcelo Odilon Cabral
    Vazou, Spyridoula
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 46 : S65 - S65