SPECIAL ISSUE The Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: Dangers and Opportunities Introduction

被引：0

|

作者：

Moore, Gregory J.

机构：

来源：

ASIAN PERSPECTIVE | 2014年 / 38卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1353/apr.2014.0007

中图分类号：

D81 [国际关系];

学科分类号：

030207 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：179 / 182

页数：4

相关论文

共 20 条

[1] Chinese Nationalism through the Prism of the Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands
Burcu, Oana
[J]. ASIAN STUDIES REVIEW, 2023, 47 (01): : 152 - 172
[2] Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: The Pending Controversy from the Chinese Perspective
Zhongqi Pan
[J]. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 2007, 12 (1) : 71 - 92
[3] The US role in the Sino-Japanese dispute over the Diaoyu (Senkaku) Islands, 1945-1971
Blanchard, JMF
[J]. CHINA QUARTERLY, 2000, (161): : 95 - 123
[4] Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: The Pending Controversy from the Chinese Perspective
Pan, Zhongqi
[J]. JOURNAL OF CHINESE POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 12 (01) : 71 - 92
[5] The stability of proximity: the resilience of Sino-Japanese relations over the Senkaku/Diaoyu Dispute
Yu, Yun
Kim, Ji Young
[J]. INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS OF THE ASIA-PACIFIC, 2019, 19 (02) : 327 - 355
[6] Sovereign rights and territorial space in Sino-Japanese relations: Irredentism and the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands
Park, CH
[J]. INTERNATIONAL HISTORY REVIEW, 2001, 23 (03): : 728 - 729
[7] The Senkaku/Diaoyu dispute and Sino-Japanese political-economic relations: cold politics and hot economics?
Koo, Min Gyo
[J]. PACIFIC REVIEW, 2009, 22 (02): : 205 - 232
[8] SINO-JAPANESE DISPUTE OVER TIAO-YU-TAI (SENKAKU) ISLANDS AND LAW OF TERRITORIAL ACQUISITION
CHENG, T
[J]. VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 1974, 14 (02): : 221 - 266
[9] Reporting on the dispute over the Diaoyu Diaoyu/Diaoyutai/Senkaku islands in selected slovenian media
Istenic, Sasa
[J]. ASIAN STUDIES-AZIJSKE STUDIJE, 2015, 3 (01): : 263 - 280
[10] Discourse interactions in world politics: the dispute over the Diaoyu/Senkaku islands
Zhai, Yida
[J]. CAMBRIDGE REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2021, 34 (04) : 570 - 589