Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall in Technology Hardware and Equipment Industry Using Fuzzy Model

被引:0
|
作者
Amante, Mayca Joy M. [1 ]
Calinisan, John Paulo A. [2 ]
Co, Vicente L.
Quevedo, Venusmar C.
Quevedo, Francispito P.
机构
[1] Adamson Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Manila 1000, Philippines
[2] Manly Plast Inc, Quezon City 1104, Philippines
关键词
Value-at-Risk; Expected Shortfall; Technology Hardware and Equipment Industry; Fuzzy Model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The fuzzy logic systems assist in simplifying large-scale risk management frameworks. For risks that do not have a proper quantitative probability model, a fuzzy logic system can aid model the cause-and-effect relationships, assess the degree of risk exposure and rank the key risks in a reliable way, considering both the available data and experts' opinions. For companies with broad risk exposure, diversified business and operations in multiple geographic regions, the long list of risks that need to be monitored makes in-depth risk analysis excessive, especially when there are entangled relationships among risk factors. Such an analysis could be costly and extremely tedious without the use of a fuzzy logic system. In addition, fuzzy logic systems include rules that clearly explain the linkage, dependence and relationships among modeled factors. It is helpful for identifying risk mitigation solutions. Resources can then be used to mitigate the risks with the highest level of exposure and relatively low hedging cost. This paper studied the application of Fuzzy Logic System Approach in determining the company's value-at-risk and also to assess risk analysis. This was applied to Technology Hardware and Equipment Industry in the Philippine. It was explored in areas where fuzzy logic models may be applied to improve risk assessment and risk decision-making. It discussed the methodology, framework and process of using fuzzy logic systems for risk management.
引用
收藏
页码:2539 / 2544
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall Relationship
    Rohmawati, Aniq A.
    Syuhada, Khreshna I. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS & STATISTICS, 2015, 53 (05): : 200 - 205
  • [2] Estimation risk for value-at-risk and expected shortfall
    Kabaila, Paul
    Mainzer, Rheanna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK, 2018, 20 (03): : 29 - 47
  • [3] Empirical likelihood for value-at-risk and expected shortfall
    Baysal, Rafet Evren
    Staum, Jeremy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK, 2008, 11 (01): : 3 - 32
  • [4] Monitoring Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall Forecasts
    Hoga, Yannick
    Demetrescu, Matei
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2023, 69 (05) : 2954 - 2971
  • [5] Comparative analyses of expected shortfall and value-at-risk
    Yamai, Y
    Yoshiba, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONS RESEARCH SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2002, 45 (04) : 490 - 506
  • [6] Dependent bootstrapping for value-at-risk and expected shortfall
    Laker, Ian
    Huang, Chun-Kai
    Clark, Allan Ernest
    [J]. RISK MANAGEMENT-JOURNAL OF RISK CRISIS AND DISASTER, 2017, 19 (04): : 301 - 322
  • [7] Dependent bootstrapping for value-at-risk and expected shortfall
    Ian Laker
    Chun-Kai Huang
    Allan Ernest Clark
    [J]. Risk Management, 2017, 19 : 301 - 322
  • [8] Fuzzy value-at-risk and expected shortfall for portfolios with heavy-tailed returns
    Moussa, A. Mbairadjim
    Kamdem, J. Sadefo
    Terraza, M.
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2014, 39 : 247 - 256
  • [9] Value-at-risk versus expected shortfall: A practical perspective
    Yamai, Y
    Yoshiba, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2005, 29 (04) : 997 - 1015
  • [10] Inefficiency and bias of modified value-at-risk and expected shortfall
    Martin, R. Douglas
    Arora, Rohit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK, 2017, 19 (06): : 59 - 84