Ipsilesional attentional-approach neglect or crossover effect

被引:6
|
作者
Drago, Valeria
Jeong, Yong
Crucian, Gregory P.
Fitzgerald, David B.
Finney, Glen R.
Mizuno, Tomoyuki
Pisani, Francesco
Heilman, Kenneth M.
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Neurol, Coll Med, McKnight Brain Inst UF, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Ctr Neuropsychol Studies, Coll Med, McKnight Brain Inst UF, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[3] Dept Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Neurol Serv, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Messina, Dept Neurosci Psychiat & Anaesthesiol Sci, Neurol Clin 1, Messina, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1080/13554790600598758
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Patients with ipsilateral neglect (IN) bisect lines toward contralesional space. It has been posited that IN might be induced by an attempt at compensation, as part of the crossover effect, where patients with an ipsilesional bias when bisecting long lines, cross over and develop a contralesional bias on short lines or as a release of an approach (grasp) behavior that might be attentional or intentional. To test these alternative hypotheses we had a patient with IN from a right medial frontal lesion bisect lines that contained no cue, a left-sided cue, a right-sided cue, and bilateral cues. If this patient had ipsilateral neglect (IN) because of a crossover effect or compensation, right-sided cues should have influenced bisection more than left-sided cues. We, however, found that only left-sided cues induced a significant change (left-sided deviation) providing support for the attentional-approach (grasp) hypothesis. Further support of this contralesional attentional grasp hypothesis comes from the observation that this patient also had ipsilesional extinction to simultaneous stimuli.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 211
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neglect crossover effect: Attentional or intentional
    Burks, DW
    Barrett, AM
    Crucian, GP
    Heilman, KM
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1999, 52 (06) : A460 - A460
  • [2] Ipsilesional versus contralesional neglect depends on attentional demands
    Na, DL
    Adair, JC
    Choi, SH
    Seo, DW
    Kang, Y
    Heilman, KM
    [J]. CORTEX, 2000, 36 (04) : 455 - 467
  • [3] Ipsilesional intentional neglect and the effect of cueing
    Schwartz, RL
    Barrett, AM
    Kim, M
    Heilman, KM
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1999, 53 (09) : 2017 - 2022
  • [4] The effect of neglect on ipsilesional space: A case study
    Wright, A
    Olk, B
    Wee, J
    Kingstone, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, : 54 - 54
  • [5] Incomplete ipsilesional hallucinations in a patient with neglect
    Nys, Gudrun M. S.
    Nijboer, Tanja C. W.
    de Haan, Edward H. F.
    [J]. CORTEX, 2008, 44 (03) : 350 - 352
  • [6] Ipsilesional neglect: behavioural and anatomical features
    Kim, M
    Na, DL
    Kim, GM
    Adair, JC
    Lee, KH
    Heilman, KM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 67 (01): : 35 - 38
  • [7] Ipsilesional 'where' with contralesional 'what' neglect
    Kwon, Jay Cheol
    Ahn, Sunyoung
    Kim, Sunghee
    Heilman, Kenneth M.
    [J]. NEUROCASE, 2012, 18 (05) : 415 - 423
  • [8] Ipsilesional attentional deficits in left hemianopia
    Perez, C.
    Coubard, O.
    Kazandjian, S.
    Laine, J.
    Obadia, M.
    Gout, O.
    Buchsbaum, M.
    Chokron, S.
    [J]. PERCEPTION, 2008, 37 (06) : 967 - 967
  • [9] Pieces of the true crossover effect in neglect
    Anderson, B
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1997, 49 (03) : 809 - 812
  • [10] Evidence for a pervasive crossover effect in neglect
    Anderson, B
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1997, 48 (03) : 62004 - 62004