Italian risk factor-based screening for gestational diabetes

被引:22
|
作者
Corrado, F. [1 ]
Pintaudi, B. [2 ]
Di Vieste, G. [2 ]
Interdonato, M. L. [1 ]
Magliarditi, M. [1 ]
Santamaria, A. [1 ]
D'Anna, R. [1 ]
Di Benedetto, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Messina, Policlin Univ Gazzi, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, I-98125 Messina, Italy
[2] Univ Messina, Policlin Univ Gazzi, Dept Internal Med, I-98125 Messina, Italy
来源
关键词
Gestational diabetes mellitus; perinatal outcome; risk factor; selective screening; universal screening; MELLITUS; CRITERIA; STRATEGY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.3109/14767058.2013.860961
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
There is a debate about whether universal or risk factors-based screening is most appropriate for gestational diabetes diagnosis. The aim of our retrospective study was to compare in our population the universal screening test recommended by the International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) panel and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) versus the selective screening proposed by the United Kingdom National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines (NICE) but modified by the Italian National Institute of Health. From May 2010 to October 2011 all consecutive pregnant women were screened for gestational diabetes according to the IADPSG's panel criteria, while all the risk factors for each patient were registered. Of the 1015 pregnant women included in the study, 113 (11%) were diagnosed with gestational diabetes and 26 (23%) of them would not have been identified by the selective screening proposed by the Italian National Institute of Health. However, all the risk factors considered by the selective screening revealed a good predictive role except for maternal age >= 35 years (OR: 0.98). In the group without the risk factors considered, it was reported the predictive role for gestational diabetes of prepregnancy BMI and nulliparity. The selective risk factors-based screening proposed by the Italian National Institute of Health has detected 77% of gestational diabetes cases in our population, sparing the oral glucose tolerance test for more than 40% of pregnant women at the same time. More information on the clinical impact of this choice could be obtained by a strict analysis of treatment, perinatal outcome and follow-up of an adequate sample size of "missed" gestational diabetes.
引用
收藏
页码:1445 / 1448
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The changing face of gestational diabetes: the effect of the shift from risk factor-based to comprehensive screening
    Koivunen, Sanna
    Kajantie, Eero
    Torkki, Annukka
    Bloigu, Aini
    Gissler, Mika
    Pouta, Anneli
    Vaarasmaki, Marja
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 173 (05) : 623 - 632
  • [2] 50 gram oral glucose challenge test combined with risk factor-based screening for gestational diabetes
    Pöyhönen-Alho, MK
    Teramo, KA
    Kaaja, RJ
    Hiilesmaa, VK
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2005, 121 (01): : 34 - 37
  • [3] Universal vs. risk factor-based screening for gestational diabetes mellitus: detection rates, gestation at diagnosis and outcome
    Griffin, ME
    Coffey, M
    Johnson, H
    Scanlon, P
    Foley, M
    Stronge, J
    O'Meara, NM
    Firth, RG
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2000, 17 (01) : 26 - 32
  • [4] Is Risk Factor-based Screening Good Enough to Detect Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in High-Risk Pregnant Women? A Sri Lankan Experience
    Herath, H. M. Meththananda
    Weerarathna, Thilak Priyantha
    Weerasinghe, Nayani Prasangika
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 7
  • [5] Risk factor screening for gestational diabetes mellitus based on the 2013 WHO criteria
    Benhalima, Katrien
    Van Crombrugge, Paul
    Moyson, Carolien
    Verhaeghe, Johan
    Vandeginste, Sofie
    Verlaenen, Hilde
    Vercammen, Chris
    Maes, Toon
    Dufraimont, Els
    De Block, Christophe
    Jacquemyn, Yves
    Mekahli, Farah
    De Clippel, Katrien
    Van Den Bruel, Annick
    Loccufier, Anne
    Laenen, Annouschka
    Minschart, Caro
    Devlieger, Roland
    Mathieu, Chantal
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 180 (06) : 353 - 363
  • [6] Universal versus risk factor screening for gestational diabetes mellitus
    Ferraiolo, A.
    Bordone, C.
    Ramone, A.
    Sala, P.
    Gorlero, F.
    Gustavino, C.
    Cordera, R.
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 45 (01): : 53 - 57
  • [7] Comparison of 3 risk factor-based screening tools for the identification of prediabetes
    Gamston, Courtney E.
    Kirby, Anna N.
    Hansen, Richard A.
    Redden, David T.
    Whitley, Heather P.
    Hanson, Courtney
    Lloyd, Kimberly B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 60 (03) : 481 - 484
  • [8] Feasibility of Risk Factor-Based Screening for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Trauma
    Petersen-Pugmire, Karen
    Jimenez, Brian
    Carter, Raquiah
    Faroqui, Naqeeb
    Parks, Madeline
    Bliton, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA NURSING, 2023, 30 (01) : 27 - 33
  • [9] Is previous macrosomia a risk factor for gestational diabetes in the era of general screening?
    Magenheim, R.
    Tabak, A.
    Lengyel, Z.
    Toth, K. S.
    Levardi, F.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 114 (04)
  • [10] Selective screening for gestational diabetes development based on risk factors
    Vladimirova, M.
    Tankova, T.
    Atanasova, I.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2015, 58 : S487 - S488