Integrating enzyme fermentation in lignocellulosic ethanol production: life-cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis

被引:74
|
作者
Olofsson, Johanna [1 ]
Barta, Zsolt [2 ]
Borjesson, Pal [1 ]
Wallberg, Ola [3 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Technol & Soc, Div Environm & Energy Syst Studies, John Ericssons Vag 1, S-22363 Lund, Sweden
[2] Budapest Univ Technol & Econ, Fac Chem Technol & Biotechnol, Dept Appl Biotechnol & Food Sci, Muegyet Rkp 3, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Nat Vetarvagen 14, S-22362 Lund, Sweden
关键词
LCA; Bioethanol; Second generation (2G); Cellulases; Process economics; On-site; Off-site; Greenhouse gases; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; CELLULASE PRODUCTION; SIMULTANEOUS SACCHARIFICATION; TRICHODERMA-REESEI; PRETREATED SPRUCE; HARVESTING STUMPS; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; ENERGY; BIOMASS;
D O I
10.1186/s13068-017-0733-0
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Cellulase enzymes have been reported to contribute with a significant share of the total costs and greenhouse gas emissions of lignocellulosic ethanol production today. A potential future alternative to purchasing enzymes from an off-site manufacturer is to integrate enzyme and ethanol production, using microorganisms and part of the lignocellulosic material as feedstock for enzymes. This study modelled two such integrated process designs for ethanol from logging residues from spruce production, and compared it to an off-site case based on existing data regarding purchased enzymes. Greenhouse gas emissions and primary energy balances were studied in a life-cycle assessment, and cost performance in a techno-economic analysis. Results: The base case scenario suggests that greenhouse gas emissions per MJ of ethanol could be significantly lower in the integrated cases than in the off-site case. However, the difference between the integrated and off-site cases is reduced with alternative assumptions regarding enzyme dosage and the environmental impact of the purchased enzymes. The comparison of primary energy balances did not show any significant difference between the cases. The minimum ethanol selling price, to reach break-even costs, was from 0.568 to 0.622 EUR L-1 for the integrated cases, as compared to 0.581 EUR L-1 for the off-site case. Conclusions: An integrated process design could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from lignocellulose-based ethanol production, and the cost of an integrated process could be comparable to purchasing enzymes produced off-site. This study focused on the environmental and economic assessment of an integrated process, and in order to strengthen the comparison to the off-site case, more detailed and updated data regarding industrial off-site enzyme production are especially important.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating enzyme fermentation in lignocellulosic ethanol production: life-cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis
    Johanna Olofsson
    Zsolt Barta
    Pål Börjesson
    Ola Wallberg
    [J]. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 10
  • [2] Comparative Techno-economic, Uncertainty and Life Cycle Analysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass Solvent Liquefaction and Sugar Fermentation to Ethanol
    Li, Wenqin
    Ghosh, Arpa
    Bbosa, Denis
    Brown, Robert
    Wright, Mark Mba
    [J]. ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2018, 6 (12): : 16515 - 16524
  • [3] Process Integration for the Production of Bioplastic Monomer: Techno-Economic Analysis and Life-Cycle Assessment
    Yang, Yong
    Seo, Kyeongjun
    Kwon, Joseph Sang-Il
    Won, Wangyun
    [J]. ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (30): : 11167 - 11180
  • [4] Life-cycle Carbon Footprint Assessment and Techno-economic Analysis of Integrated Energy Production Unit
    Yu, Qianyue
    Zhang, Yuqiong
    Zhao, Qiang
    Sun, Li
    [J]. Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering, 2024, 44 (08): : 3115 - 3124
  • [5] Techno-economic analysis of lignocellulosic ethanol: A review
    Gnansounou, Edgard
    Dauriat, Arnaud
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (13) : 4980 - 4991
  • [6] Microalgae biofuels: A comparative study on techno-economic analysis & life-cycle assessment
    Dutta, Smritikana
    Neto, Fernando
    Coelho, Margarida C.
    [J]. ALGAL RESEARCH-BIOMASS BIOFUELS AND BIOPRODUCTS, 2016, 20 : 44 - 52
  • [7] Techno-economic analysis of lignocellulosic ethanol production based on experimental data
    Klein-Marcuschamer, Daniel
    Simmons, Blake
    Blanch, Harvey
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 239
  • [8] Techno-economic analysis and life-cycle assessment of cellulosic isobutanol and comparison with cellulosic ethanol and n-butanol
    Tao, Ling
    Tan, Eric C. D.
    McCormick, Robert
    Zhang, Min
    Aden, Andy
    He, Xin
    Zigler, Bradley T.
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2014, 8 (01): : 30 - 48
  • [9] Life-cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of the production of wood vinegar from stem: a case study
    Zheng, Ji-Lu
    Zhu, Ya-Hong
    Dong, Yan-Yan
    Zhu, Ming-Qiang
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF CHEMICAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 17 (08) : 1109 - 1121
  • [10] Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of wood-based biorefineries for cellulosic ethanol production
    Qian, Qian
    Luo, Zhongyang
    Sun, Haoran
    Wei, Qi
    Shi, Jingkang
    Li, Longfei
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 399