Applications of the Chinese version of the primary care PTSD screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5) for children

被引:26
|
作者
Li Jina [1 ,2 ]
Zhang Weijun [1 ,2 ]
Chen Wenrui [3 ]
Yuan Hui [1 ,2 ]
Zhang Shengfa [1 ,2 ]
Tian Meng [1 ,2 ]
Qu Zhiyong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Ctr Behav Hlth, 19 Xinjiekou Wai St, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Social Dev & Publ Policy, 19 Xinjiekou Wai St, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] New Sch, India China Inst, New York, NY 10011 USA
关键词
Posttraumatic stress disorder; Validity; Sensitivity and specificity; ROC curve; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; CHECKLIST; TRAUMA; ADOLESCENTS; PREVALENCE; PCL-5; INSTRUMENTS; VALIDATION; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.021
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Effective screening is important for public mental health services. Although the primary care PTSD screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5) is useful in screening for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults, its reliability and validity for use in children remain unclear. This study aimed to examine the performance characteristics of the Chinese PC-PTSD-5 for children in children aged 8 to 16 years. Methods: 4,022 rural children from Grades 4 to 9 in China were included in this study. All participants were assessed for PTSD using the Chinese PC-PTSD-5 for children and the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), and assessed for anxiety using the Chinese version of the State Anxiety Scale for Children (CSAS-C), and for depression using the Children's Depression Inventory - Short Form (CDI-S). The performance characteristics of the PC-PTSD-5 for children were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analyses. Results: The mean scores on the PCL-5 and the PC-PTSD-5 were 17.45 (SD = 14.78) and 1.78 (SD = 1.33), respectively. There was a significant correlation between the PC-PTSD-5 and PCL-5 (r = 0.54, p < 0.001), and small but significant correlations of the PC-PTSD-5 with the CSAS-C (r = 0.31, p < 0.001) and CDI-S (r = 0.27, p < 0.001). In this study, 2 and 3 were both found to be acceptable cutoff values. A cutoff value of 2 yielded a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.52, while a cutoff of 3 had sensitivity = 0.57, and specificity = 0.77. Limitations: A clinical interview was not used to validated diagnostic findings. Conclusions: The reliability and validity of the Chinese PC-PTSD-5 were statistically acceptable for screening for probable PTSD in children. Additionally, the Chinese PC-PTSD-5 had a favorable sensitivity at a cut off 2 and a favorable specificity at a cut off 3, based on PCL-5 results.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 114
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5) within a civilian primary care sample
    Williamson, Meredith L. C.
    Stickley, Mariah M.
    Armstrong, Trey W.
    Jackson, Kaylee
    Console, Katie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 78 (11) : 2299 - 2308
  • [2] The Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5): Development and Evaluation Within a Veteran Primary Care Sample
    Prins, Annabel
    Bovin, Michelle J.
    Smolenski, Derek J.
    Marx, Brian P.
    Kimerling, Rachel
    Jenkins-Guarnieri, Michael A.
    Kaloupek, Danny G.
    Schnurr, Paula P.
    Kaiser, Anica Pless
    Leyva, Yani E.
    Tiet, Quyen Q.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 (10) : 1206 - 1211
  • [3] The Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5): Development and Evaluation Within a Veteran Primary Care Sample
    Annabel Prins
    Michelle J. Bovin
    Derek J. Smolenski
    Brian P. Marx
    Rachel Kimerling
    Michael A. Jenkins-Guarnieri
    Danny G. Kaloupek
    Paula P. Schnurr
    Anica Pless Kaiser
    Yani E. Leyva
    Quyen Q. Tiet
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2016, 31 : 1206 - 1211
  • [4] Diagnostic Accuracy of the Primary Care PTSD for DSM-5 Screen (PC-PTSD-5) in Demographic and Diagnostic Subgroups of Veterans
    Tiet, Quyen Q.
    Tiet, Thien-Nha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 39 (11) : 2017 - 2022
  • [5] A Brief Screening Tool for PTSD: Validation of the Korean Version of the Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 ( K-PC-PTSD-5)
    Jung, Young-Eun
    Kim, Daeho
    Kim, Won-Hyoung
    Roh, Daeyoung
    Chae, Jeong-Ho
    Park, Joo Eon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 33 (52)
  • [6] Screening for PTSD in Police Officers: Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Adapted Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5 [0-20]) Screener
    Baker, Lucas D.
    Dolezal, Michael L.
    Goodson, Jason T.
    Smith, Andrew J.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA-THEORY RESEARCH PRACTICE AND POLICY, 2024,
  • [7] Evaluating the Performance of the Primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5) in a Trauma-Exposed, Socioeconomically Vulnerable Patient Population
    Emma C. Lathan
    Jessica M. Petri
    Tamara Haynes
    Stan C. Sonu
    Yara Mekawi
    Vasiliki Michopoulos
    Abigail Powers
    [J]. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 2023, 30 : 791 - 803
  • [8] Evaluating the Performance of the Primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5) in a Trauma-Exposed, Socioeconomically Vulnerable Patient Population
    Lathan, Emma C.
    Petri, Jessica M.
    Haynes, Tamara
    Sonu, Stan C.
    Mekawi, Yara
    Michopoulos, Vasiliki
    Powers, Abigail
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY IN MEDICAL SETTINGS, 2023, 30 (04) : 791 - 803
  • [9] Validating the primary care posttraumatic stress disorder screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5) in a substance misusing, trauma-exposed, socioeconomically vulnerable population
    Patton, Samantha C.
    Hinojosa, Cecilia A.
    Lathan, Emma C.
    Welsh, Justine W.
    Powers, Abigail
    [J]. ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2023, 139
  • [10] CONSIDERING PTSD FOR DSM-5
    Friedman, Matthew J.
    Resick, Patricia A.
    Bryant, Richard A.
    Brewin, Chris R.
    [J]. DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2011, 28 (09) : 750 - 769